生活残骸

起初是衝著Tilda swinton來看的，看看著實有喜感，尤其一開場爸爸對女兒的自白，以洋娃娃為比喻笑破肚皮........LeBron James演自己自然得很，這點很有驚喜，tilda做的衰神上司當然亮眼，最後結局算是有驚喜，可惜男女主皆外型及演技一般，浪費了整體感觀，浪漫輕喜劇就是要看俊男美女這個是基本吧？！

去看侏罗纪的时候看到的预告片本是单纯的冲着James去的讲真 James 在里面可爱哭啊！

每套衣服都那么随意合适有风格！！！

（所以平时也要这么打扮！

答应我好吗！！

不要背你那个MCM的小包包了好吗！！！！！！

btw 我觉得唯一不好看的就是打篮球那套T恤了。。。

深度怀疑那是他自己的衣服。。。

啊哈哈哈）而且在里面也很好笑 几乎本色出演嘛虽然他自己觉得自己演的不好 但我还是很喜欢啊 啊啊啊 除了James之外没想到很喜欢这部电影 感觉是今年看到的最好的轻松型喜剧了开头处 Amy 爸爸用doll 比做恋人解释了跟妈妈离婚的原因 也顺便给Amy 灌输了“奇怪的”三观其实也不能算奇怪吧？

就是简单追求快乐 而不想settle down的感觉就像他说的那样 一辈子就跟一个玩具玩儿 想想就很悲伤啊 总感觉玩具城 就像花花世界很精彩 每个玩具都想拿起来玩儿两下但你总会遇见一个玩具 是你想要每晚都跟它睡在一起的那个玩具你会越来越喜欢它 离不开他我就有一个 花椰菜（就是ikea买的很便宜那个）虽然平时床上放着 草莓娃娃 姜饼娃娃 阿毛 小青蛙 无脸人 我都喜欢 但睡觉只会抱着 我的花椰菜好羡慕Amy遇到自己的花椰菜

导演是一手炮制美式现代都会爱情喜剧类型片的Judd Apatow，导演过《四十岁老处男》，《一夜大肚》；制片过很多90年代的脱口秀，包括像《本斯蒂勒秀》，金凯利的一些低成本喜剧，大部分他自己导演的片子和《伴娘》。

女主演兼编剧Amy Schumer在美国拥有自己的脱口秀Inside Amy Schumer，家喻户晓。

片子奉承《伴娘》和导演Judd Apatow的优良传统，充斥大量限制级元素，女主角开篇床戏就大吼尺寸太大好痛好痛！

本片终极探索也是美国典型都市环境下有承诺恐惧综合征的事业男女们突破自己的故事，不论是Amy Schumer饰演的女主角角色还是Bill Hader的运动医生角色或者是Tilda Swinton饰演的如同Anna Wintour一样的歪斜女老板角色都是典型的美国都市中年缺乏安全感，性欲旺盛，面临40年限，事业平淡的承诺恐惧综合征患者。

片子在结构上和《伴娘》极其相似，女性主人公在情感和事业期的瓶颈通过自我反思和生活达到精神顿彻。

极度生活化的对白和口无遮拦是的情色端子鞭笞着观众脆弱的心脏。

引用片中Tilda Swinton的话说“我喜欢你，Amy。

你聪明但又不太有头脑，你可爱但又不够性感。

总结一句话：你挺low的。

”

值得下班累了坐沙发上看。

哦，再搭上一瓶啤酒，一份炸鸡。

之前看trailer便觉得男女主人公对白刺激辛辣笑感十足。

看完电影之后更是多了温馨甜蜜。

Amy真是算不上传统好莱坞chick flick的标配。

脸上赘肉挺多，化妆太浓假睫毛太明显眼影太黑，身材肥嘟嘟似乎走路还有些外趴。

虽然总是穿着低胸超短裙大高跟且大有“略男人万千”之气场，但还是和性感二字搭不上边。

工作似乎和写作相关，但电影似乎又很少拍到她坐在哪里看书写字。

总之，文化气场也是low low的，也不文艺。

这么多吐槽其实就一个观点，她太普通。

不过这不妨碍她活得很自我，很自在。

忠于自己的感情，内心，好恶。

就这点来说，她还是很有魅力，绝对增加她的可爱值。

现在想起她漏嘴说得那些傻逼事儿还是觉得萌萌的，被黑得很好笑。

什么，never watch sports, have no single friend of black people, hate uptown girl, gonna marry the best-ever-sex guy...blah blah blah. 她大概是不美丽，但是绝对不令人觉得讨厌。

其实我觉得Amy还挺善良挺傻大姐的。

有的时候，害怕intimacy的一个原因也许是害怕对方受到伤害。

她担忧如果有一天自己变老变丑变傻逼的时候，Aaron还要忍受自己的不完美和生活的平凡。

与其这般“伤心”收尾，倒不如不曾开始。

Never once let myself go也就不会心痛到哪里去。

这样的想法很符合逻辑啊。

但换种角度想，也许她内心还是怯弱和自私。

毕竟任何关系是两个人组成的。

单方面的决定感情的走向对一方并不是很公平。

另一方面呢，Aaron早早dive in，早早说出I love you（虽然很搞笑地在她父亲的葬礼上）, 早早坦白自己愿意和她解决任何问题的决心。

但是Amy is not ready. 就像Aaron说地那样，She pushed me out. She doesn't want me in. 不过怎么说呢，害怕胆怯都很正常哪怕是遇到一个像Aaron这样的在我看来完美男人般的“对手”。

但是，我觉得任何内心小揪揪肯定是敌不过相爱的。

如果敌过了，那是因为不爱，或者爱不够。

火候没到来着。

电影其实收尾有些仓促，短暂地似有似无地乱七八糟地过度到了Amy突破重重自我限制，上演爱的大走秀。

看到她跳cheerleader舞，我真是有些眼睛湿润。

被她try so hard, push herself so hard, want him so hard cuz love him so hard 那种情绪感动了。

做了很多自我建设是为了越过自己内心的那座桥去和你相遇。

不是每个人都成功走到了桥的另一端的。

这个电影出彩就在于它时不时地搞笑。

不是什么单纯地纯爱片。

最后，Amy还想尝试篮球飞人的动作，直接弹跳床上垂直降落的片段，真是让人笑到喷血。

Aaron不遗余力地黑她，说是你也挺猛的，一点都弹不起来，和一般正常人不同。

女主又回复说，我就是想让你知道我有多么努力。

ohhhhh。。。。

这种傻逼狗血桥段也是赞赞的。

演员还能拍到这么入戏好敬业。

爱情太尼玛神奇。

自己做了千万件别人眼里的傻逼事情还依旧浑然不知彼此乐享其中。

敢情跟抽大麻似的。

本人很喜欢Aaron Conners这个角色。

成熟，简单，干净，柔和，直白。

真是没话说。

非常严肃但是非常可爱。

其实Amy很幸运能遇到这么一个长情简单在一起不厌的人。

Aaron和LeBron那些桥段好不诙谐。

LeBron一副他是我bro你别伤害他，挺起哥们来扛扛的。

为了14美金算来算去患得患失也是黑得醉了。

最后，还组织小组集会拯救陷于悲伤地失意人。

粗犷的外表搭上爱情导师的角色，我表示喜感十足。

总之，这是一个很全面很生活很踏实的片子。

有性爱的spice调节气氛, 也有soulmate的温馨留有余香。

如果喜欢篮球的话，更是会多一份看头。

我对篮球的喜欢只是很浅薄的对于人的喜欢而已，虽然我也很喜欢LeBron但总体还是无感。

我力荐

Judd Apatow和Amy Schumer的访谈，收录在他的书Sick in the Head中。

I was sitting in my car one day, listening to The Howard Stern Show, when Amy Schumer came on. I think I had seen her do a little stand-up on television once or twice before, or maybe just some jokes at a roast, but that’s about it. I didn’t have a clear picture in my mind. But sitting there in my car, listening to her talk to Howard, I was blown away by how funny and intimate and fresh she was. You could sense that she had stories to tell and was a lot more than just a comedian. I instantly thought: I need to make a movie with her.So we did.Amy and I spent the next few years working on Trainwreck, and I found that she was, indeed, so much more than just a comedian. She is someone who is willing to go emotionally deep, as well as work obsessively hard, and there’s a frankness to her work that I find inspiring. The stories tumble out of her. She is able to make important points about our culture and feminism and relationships and what it’s like to be a woman in America right now, and to do it in a way that is consistently insightful and hysterical. Here is someone at the beginning of a very exciting career.JUDD APATOW: I was watching a movie about women in comedy recently—I think it was called Are Women Funny? And I noticed that you weren’t in it. Was that by choice?AMY SCHUMER: I got cut out. Actually, I am in one scene. But I don’t talk.J.A.: Oh, I thought maybe it was a political choice, a way of saying, We shouldn’t even be debating this anymore.A.S.: No, that debate is insane to me. It doesn’t even make me mad. It’s like asking, Do Jewish people smell like orange juice? It’s just such a weird question. It’s not even a question. The thing that gets to me is the question “Isn’t this a great time to be a woman in comedy?” I mean, all the TV I watched growing up featured funny women.J.A.: People said the same thing when Bridesmaids came out. We never thought about that when we were making it. I just thought, Kristen Wiig is funny. It would be fun to make a movie with Kristen Wiig. And then she had this idea to make a movie about bridesmaids. We never thought of it as a female movie. At some point, in the middle of it, it occurred to us: Oh, it’s kind of cool to have so many funny women in one movie. But it wasn’t conscious or anything. At the end of the process, we realized that it meant something to people. But what is shocking to me was that, even after the movie did well, there was almost zero follow-up in the culture.A.S.: In terms of what?J.A.: In terms of funny movies that are dominated by women. The studio system didn’t embrace them. They don’t know how to do it.A.S.: In my experience, there will be a script and you’ll be like, This is funny—I think I’ll audition. And you’ll know other women, who are hilarious, are auditioning, too. And then they give it to, like, some beautiful movie star. They’re great actresses and they’re really pretty, but they’re not funny.J.A.: When we did Undeclared, the note from Fox was: You need more eye candy.A.S.: Do you think that’s true? Do people really need more eye candy?J.A.: I have thought about that a lot. I don’t know. But what if people do want it?A.S.: I’m not above that. I want to look at Jennifer Lawrence eating cereal.J.A.: Are you someone who believes that life is easier if you’re attractive?A.S.: I think that beautiful people are not any happier than people who are not as beautiful. Even with models—there’s always someone who is more beautiful or younger. So no matter what realm you’re operating in, it’s all relative. I didn’t develop my personality, or my sense of humor, because I felt unattractive. I thought I was attractive until I got older. It was probably a defense mechanism for whatever pain was going on around me. But I don’t think that people who feel beautiful feel like “I don’t need to do this other thing.”J.A.: You’re in a weird area. I would describe it as: Everyone thinks you are beautiful, but maybe you don’t agree with their opinion.A.S.: Um.J.A.: I’ll talk about me for a second. I always thought I was right in the middle, looks-wise, and that if I had a good personality it could put me over the top. But it wasn’t like, behind my back, everyone thought I was handsome. I get the sense that you feel like some days you’re looking great, some days you’re not, but the audience sees you in a certain way that maybe you don’t agree with. Does that make sense?A.S.: I think that’s probably true. I think that’s probably dead-on. I feel, like you just said, that some days I am like a real monster, completely unlovable and unfuckable, and then there’s a moment, every now and then, when I’m more like Elaine on Seinfeld: “Is it possible that I’m not as attractive as I had thought?” Or maybe it’s the opposite of that. Anytime I start feeling better about myself, physically, someone will say something that pushes me right back down. I think every woman feels this way.J.A.: I ask about it because it is about who you think you’re speaking to.A.S.: That’s a really good point.J.A.: I was a year younger than everybody in school. I was the youngest kid in class, always. But I only realized later in life that I was much smaller than everybody.A.S.: Physically?J.A.: Yeah. And by the time I caught up a little bit, in sixth or seventh grade, I had been defined. On some level, I guess it made me feel less masculine. And as a result I always feel like a fucking nerd. I have a beautiful wife, I’m successful, but I still feel like the kid who’s picked last in gym class. And that shaped my idea of comedy, being about outsiders. It was a way for me to attack all of these systems that I thought were unfair to me.A.S.: I would say the same for me.J.A.: What was your version of that? What happened to you as a kid that made you think and defined your sense of humor?A.S.: I would say, with the physical stuff, that I was always pretty but not beautiful. And that was something that you were punished for. I was very aware of this stuff early on.J.A.: With girls, it’s weird because it changes dramatically. In high school, girls don’t look anything like they looked in third grade. Whereas with guys, the handsome third-grade dude is still handsome in high school. Girls blossom and change. That was the kind of girl I always tried to date: the girl who, near the end of high school, got pretty but still acted insecure.A.S.: Well, that’s the jackpot. That’s my favorite kind of guy too. The guy that blossoms but still sees himself as the fat kid.J.A.: Al Roker.A.S.: Al Roker is the perfect example.J.A.: He lost the weight, but he’s still nice to you.A.S.: Because he remembers.J.A.: At what age did you become aware of comedians?A.S.: Really young, when we would watch the Muppets. And then I discovered stand-ups. I loved Gilda. I was so drawn to funny chicks. I remember watching Rita Rudner and George Carlin and Richard Pryor. My dad must’ve had it on. And Letterman.J.A.: How old were you?A.S.: Ten or younger. Stand-up trickled in over the years, but it wasn’t until I was in college, early college, where I discovered Margaret Cho and got really into it.J.A.: At what point did you think, Stand-up is something I can do?A.S.: After college. I was 23.J.A.: What did it take for you to think, O.K., I’m going to try this? Because it’s a crazy leap. The need to show up at an open mike—to even write your first joke. I was a lunatic about it. I was trying to write those jokes at 12.A.S.: How old were you when you got up for the first time?J.A.: Seventeen. I had wanted to do it really badly since 14, but I was afraid to admit it to anybody.A.S.: My experience was like this: I was in an abusive improv troupe after college. This guy set it up to get 50 bucks a month from each of us, but it was not really improv—it was a crazy, schizophrenic, delusional situation. I went one night to see one of the girls do stand-up at Gotham, Bring Your Show. It was like at six P.M., and she was bombing. Everyone was bombing. I thought, I want to try this because I’m not digging the improv, but I like it when I say something and I get a laugh.J.A.: That’s interesting. Because it’s not about being inspired by watching someone murder. It’s like: Oh, this is as bad as it gets. And I can do better.A.S.: I still think that all the time. It’s not that I feel like what I’m doing is so amazing, but it’s pretty good compared to what other people are doing. So that same week, I was walking past the club, and it was my birthday, and I was like, I’m from New York, so I can get people in the seats. I had three hours to prepare.J.A.: You wrote it in one day?A.S.: I wrote it in two hours.J.A.: How did you do?A.S.: Pretty good.J.A.: Do you remember any of it?A.S.: I have a tape of it. I remember it. I talked about how skywriting annoys me. Don’t you find that when you talk about your early jokes, even though you know they were bad, you’re still trying to sell them? Like, I still want you to think this is funny shit, but I know it’s not. Anyway, I talked about skywriting, how it’s annoying and it fades and you can never read it. I was like, If somebody proposed to me that way, I’d be like, Fuck you. And so like, this summer, do me a favor, keep it at eye level or whatever. So horrible. But it went O.K., I think. People came up to me and asked how long I’d been doing it, which suggested that maybe I could do this if I wanted.J.A.: What were you doing for a living back then?A.S.: Waiting tables at Michael Jordan’s Steakhouse.J.A.: Trying to get acting work?A.S.: Yeah, auditioning. But one day this woman came into the restaurant and she really liked me. She was like, I’m going to hook you up with my agent. So I went in and I did a one-act play to audition for the agent, and he was like, You’re pretty mediocre, and I have too many girls like you that are better than you.J.A.: That happened to me and I never acted again. Do you think you have a much different experience, as a woman on the road, than guys are having?A.S.: Not in terms of the audience or anything, but in terms of fun? Yeah. Like, I’ve never hooked up with somebody after a show.J.A.: I did.A.S.: You did?J.A.: Once. It lasted eight seconds and I looked in her eyes as she realized what a horrible mistake she had made. And then we had sex again, and this time it lasted six seconds, and she really looked like—if she became a nun after that, it wouldn’t have shocked me.A.S.: Oh my God.J.A.: And I thought, I’m never going to do this again. This is terrible.A.S.: I’ve had one one-night stand in my life.J.A.: And yet people see your act as very sexual.A.S.: Right.J.A.: So is that a character you’re playing?A.S.: Well, it’s a part of me, too. Because the stuff you’re copping to and the saddest, worst moments of your life—that’s the stuff people connect to and appreciate. In reality, I’ve almost always had a boyfriend. Every year, if I have like one or two sexual experiences, they might both be hilarious.J.A.: And then they add up, and people think, She must be doing this all the time. I have maybe six experiences from my whole life. But if I go onstage and tell three of them, it sounds like I have hundreds of them.A.S.: Right. But you can get up there and do that, and you’re not the Sex Guy. But if I do it, I am. So I just embraced it.J.A.: But those experiences are funny. That’s the thing. Your worst sexual experience can be so humiliating and hilarious, both in movies and in stand-up. They’re always the best stories. A guy who has got a lot of terrible sex stories is the best dinner companion of all time.Not too long ago, you gave a speech at Gloria Steinem’s birthday party. Did people have a strong reaction to that?A.S.: Yeah. I got asked to do a monologue the year before for some event—I can’t remember what it was called. It was me and all these tiny actresses, and I just felt like I needed to joke about it because we looked like an evolution chart or something. I felt like a big, blonde monster, standing with a bunch of girls who had never seen semen before. But my speech really came off strong because I was actually talking about some real things, bad things that had happened to me—and the other speeches weren’t as hard. And so Gloria asked me to come talk the following year at her birthday party. So I wrote this speech about losing all my self-esteem in college, and a kind of painful night that I tried my best to make funny.J.A.: What about it do you think connected with people?A.S.: Just the feeling of losing all your confidence and feeling like you’re worthless because of how other people are treating you. And then having to realize that the real issue is actually how you’re treating yourself. I think that’s something most people have experienced, feeling like they don’t deserve love.J.A.: Do you ever go back and read your own speech, to cheer yourself up?A.S.: Yeah, and my friends will quote it to me.J.A.: That must be a big change, to go from doing stand-up, just trying to get laughs, to realizing that people are paying attention to what you’re saying. And that they’re moved and inspired by certain things you say. It’s not just about being funny.A.S.: I’m taking this responsibility seriously. I’m looking at it as an opportunity. What do I want to say? What have I really learned? Where am I, really? I’m not interested in just saying something for shock value anymore. I do feel more of a weight about the message that I’m sending because I know what it’s like to be on the other end of that and I don’t want to be in denial about what success means—and like how many people I’m reaching now. I want to make people feel better.

LBJ出镜挺多的啊，难道艾米·舒默的个人经历真是和这群运动明星紧密相连的？

女主长得丑不用说了，男主咋说也是个专业演员，总感觉这两人做搭档不伦不类。

片子的说服力太差。

结构太松散完全没必要整俩小时，笑点主要集中在运动员身上倒是让人没有想到，笑料够黄够损，从自我放纵到自我救赎的正能量主线也足够清晰，但是，颜值太差了。

为什么这个片子好笑：1.性总是最好的段子。

比如：在杂志选题的时候讨论吃大蒜是否会导致男人的精液味道不同等；比如男女做爱的时候要求说一些黄段子之类的。

2.镜头或者情节的重复使用：开场3分钟，amy和若干个男人上床并送走他们，这个片段当中，无数个男人站在门口向amy告别。

一个镜头还好，但若干个这样的场景被快速、大数量地重复，就变得很好笑起来。

一个人不断地说谎，说一个谎就被人揭穿；再说一个谎又被揭穿，直到他不得不说出真相。

这个过程当中他可以瞎编一些谎言和根本就是胡扯的东西。

3.夸张的人物设定：（1）amy的爸爸：满嘴脏话的一个老头，愤世嫉俗到好笑，四处和人斗，但心肠软。

这个时候一定要注意他的语言要风趣，否则的话一定会让观众不喜欢，一个满嘴胡话地愤青才能让人喜欢。

（2）amy的女同事，性格非常突出。

饶舌妇，叽叽喳喳，性格略胆小，喜欢附和，脑子有点不太好用，呆呆地。

（3）amy的男同事们，一个是东亚人，一个是以色列人，从外形就可以看到明显的差异化。

也是欧美喜剧片中典型的配角。

他们都很贱，都性格有明显差异而且突出。

这些人物一定都是有各自的人物小传的，所以才能够有明显的差异。

而国内的喜剧电影人物的性格特点并不明显（剩者为王当中的同事都非常脸谱化，没有任何特色，都是观众身边能够看到的人物，平庸，无趣），即使明显也只是作为一般人的明显（比如会被设定成一个男人婆-肿瘤君中的闺蜜，或者一个娇滴滴的美女-剩着为王中的熊黛林），而不是做为一个喜剧角色的那种明显。

（4）欧美喜剧片当中一般都有一个小角色，贯穿始终。

比如片中amy楼下的流浪汉，总是有金句不断。

不占太多的篇幅，但总是让观众感到映像深刻。

然后片中会有一些路人的角色，会说一些很搞笑的话，仅仅用于调节气氛。

（5）amy的夸张性格：不喜欢和一个男人有长久的发展，所以会产生各种和想和她产生长久关系的男人各种矛盾。

amy睡觉很轻，所以她和conner一起睡觉的时候会很夸张地要求他不要大声呼气，以免感到风声。

amy跟人讲话有时候也把握不好分量，会错误判断形势，所以比如一群女人一起玩游戏讲真心话大冒险，她会真的说一些很隐私的事情，以至于众人不知道说什么好。

4.夸张的台词和语言风格：比如amy在面对男性伴侣脱下裤子露出的dick时说：“your dick never ends”以表达他的dick很长。

这个台词绝对是绝无仅有的形容，而且形象得不得了。

5.尖刻嘲讽的语言风格：amy会当众嘲笑喜欢体育的人，认为他们很无聊，认为他们人格低下。

这种略带争议的台词要演员用很自信或者一开始自信但发现大家反映不太对之后的不自信来表现。

6.对比：（1）人物反应对比：开场时，amy和一个男伴提出永久分手。

男伴并没有听懂，还在一边傻傻地搞笑，说一些非常愚蠢的话，可是amy已经明确地说了他们要分手。

观众此时是明白amy的意思的，可是男伴不懂，于是观众就在一种智力优越的地位上看这个男伴在傻傻地搞笑。

这种对比就尤其让人觉得搞笑。

另外一种对比是，一个人讲了很好笑的段子，可是另外的人没有反映，这种尴尬和沉默会让观众笑翻天。

另外一种对比是，一个人讲了很长一段自己很欣赏的言论和台词，可是另外的人没有反映，把他打发走了，这也会好笑。

（2）情节上的对比：amy让男伴做爱时说脏话，男伴说了，可是说得非常没意思。

这种错位让观众觉得好笑。

amy和男友吵架，这是男友主动发起来的吵架，可是到最后，amy话多得男友睡着了。

amy最后想投篮让男友impressed，结果最后却一下子摔在了地上，这是一个极度夸张的反衬。

（3）人物身份和形象对比：比如amy和男友在电影院和另外一个人吵架，男友就说了很多很gay的攻击性的语言，观众会觉得这些话和他的身份很不相符，这就有了差异性。

一个角色可以一本正经地说一些很扯的话，形成反差，而且他自己一点都不觉得好笑。

比如amy告诉conner她没怎么吃早饭，然后她开始数自己到底吃了些什么东西，然后观众知道她其实吃了很多东西。

amy一边跟正经的说这些话，于是就有笑点了。

intern是一个在全片当中都非常文静和一本正经的人物，但是他在私密环境当中却是一个喜欢玩SM的角色，这让人觉得很好笑。

7.其他一个人自己突然无意识地说了一些很愚蠢的话，他自己都没有意识到。

等他意识到了的时候又会嘲笑自己。

在一个场景结束的时候，需要一个人（处在这一幕当中的，或者不在这一幕当中的人）说一句很搞笑的话来结束这一幕。

比如在amy的父亲和amy的姐姐结束了一场争吵，最后姐姐离开之后，同桌吃饭的一个老头说“这个女人是你的老婆么？

”于是这个喜感就出来了。

嘲笑名人和知名商人是喜剧的一个点。

一个搞笑的段落结束的时候要很快就切掉，要造成一种意犹未尽的感觉，而不是让这个笑点慢慢消逝掉。

喜剧当中需要有有分量的悲剧，但悲剧持续的时间不宜过长，而且都要穿插喜剧的台词或者以喜剧结束。

我想到这个标题的时候，正看着电脑屏幕上的胖妞在空中笔直地坠落。

我终于没有憋住，噗嗤一下笑了。

然后我就默默地打开了文档，敲下了这7个字，然后一直发呆到现在。

回顾电影，整部电影从头到尾都是限制级的笑料，男主角是大暖男，女主角是大胖妞。

詹姆斯的表现很惊喜。

我以为只是喜剧片，但着实把我惊到了。

电影里的姑娘滥交、粗鲁、说脏话、酗酒、抽大麻、不相信婚姻和家庭，正如那个另类女王Tilda Swinton在电影中说的一样：“我喜欢你，Amy。

你聪明但又不太有头脑，你可爱但又不够性感。

总结一句话：你挺low的。

” 就是这样一个姑娘，还不相信家庭，成天过着放浪形骸的生活，她并不是风流，她只是害怕失去，只是害怕属于一个人。

于是，这样一个女孩子，真的有救吗。

她的生活像是一片残骸。

但换句话说，生活本就是残骸，而我们奋斗一生的意义，便在于将所有残骸一块一块按照规则拼好。

我是中段后进入角色的，前段我GET不到太多的笑点，而整体情节又乏善可陈，以至于我有些昏昏欲睡，已经打算把这部电影关掉了。

突然我看见姑娘脸上的笑容，这笑容与众不同。

我被吸引住了。

我终于知道，所谓爱上的表情是怎么样的。

你回收期所有的放荡和混乱，只因为有那么一瞬间，你看见一张温暖的脸。

我知道这故事和绝大多数的故事不同，一个女孩，自己选择了失去所有东西。

仿佛是一夜之间命运撕碎了所有伪装，将最丑恶的嘴脸呈现在她的面前。

这样的故事也不停地发生在我的身边。

经常有朋友对我说：“我把生活搞砸了。

”最近跟我说这话的朋友是诺仔。

诺仔和电影里的女主角的遭遇竟然如出一辙。

诺仔是微胖界的一个奇葩，作为一个男生都要对她的饭量仰视。

她找我谈的那天，我就看着她在我对面暴饮暴食。

我有点看不下去了，就跟她说：“你再这样吃下去，就要把肚子撑爆了。

”她看着我说：“这大概是我在这座城市最后一次暴饮暴食了。

”我：“那你是要换个地方暴饮暴食？

”诺仔：“要是能把你变成番茄酱，我一定把你蘸着吃了。

我的爸爸病了，我得回去照顾他。

”我：“你不是刚刚要当上主编吗？

”诺仔：“已经被辞退了。

”我：“那你男朋友呢，你不是为了他才来这里的吗？

”诺仔：“劈腿了。

”我：“你走吧。

”这时候，看着对面暴饮暴食的姑娘，我的心里有种说不出的感觉。

似乎已经没有任何理由坚持下去了，似乎所有继续下去的勇气都已经消失殆尽了。

那时如果我看过这部电影，一定会对这个姑娘说：“你看看人家，生活就是残骸，它是不完整的，这是天生的，关键是，你怎么把他拼好。

”可是现在看着诺仔和一个相亲认识的小伙子结婚，觉得这也是个不错的选择。

每个人的生活并不相同，但都是在一块一块的碎片中寻找自己的幸福。

生活总是越变越糟的，可问题是怎么在最糟的生活里找到最好的自己，这才是最好的结果。

电影里，女主角找到幸福的同时，却仍然在不停怀疑自己是否幸福，在怀疑的过程中失去，在失去的过程中得到，这就是所谓生活。

我其实对那个老父亲的理论觉得很有意思，这世界上有那么娃娃，为什么要只玩一个呢？

生活是残骸的另一重意义就在于，所有的碎片，都是只属于你的。

就像是娃娃一样，你可以玩过很多个娃娃，但只有一个娃娃会属于你。

而人的一生，到底有多少时间在费劲了心思却寻找这些流落在四周的碎片，去寻找只属于自己的属于。

这也许就是电影要告诉我们的事情。

生活本就是残骸，而我们能做的就是找到属于我们的碎片完整的生活。

He is soooooo fucking cute！！！

Trainwreck真的是满足了我个人对bill的所有私心：有点nerdy，非常有耐心，温柔体贴，really good at That thing，全心全意百分百的爱着女主无论女主前期多么的自暴自弃。

Today show那个女主持谈到的 作为一个浪漫喜剧男主 He has to be cute but approachable and also has a sex appeal 我是觉得Bill都做到了 他的身高样貌气质啥的确实适合这种有点书呆子但是又很热情天真的角色。

被剪掉的他和女主do That thing的第二天早上睡眼朦胧像个被春日阳光喊醒的毛茸茸小动物一样可怜无辜 声音哑哑的跟女主说good morning。

作为资深lsp我只能说感谢万能的互联网🙏还有他们俩喝多了去偷人家马的那段也很妙 其实更能体现出男主不完全是个nerd 他也有很疯狂很对女主胃口的那一面 他跟女主在一起是完全放松的 是真的爱女主的。

电影就是个典型的浪漫喜剧 女主原生家庭有缺陷最后变成Fuck-up girl却和德才兼备的体育医生相爱 俩人一定得争吵 冷战 然后女主与家庭和解 意识到自己是个混蛋 为爱改变 再追回男友 结尾一个大Happy ending。

剧情有点老套 但女主的成长确实还蛮走心的 因为本身就是女主自己根据真实经历写的剧本 再加上男主是我的new crush 所以这个电影总的来说还是不错啦！

————————————————————这个片子对于亲情 婚姻观 女性自我拯救讲的也还行 算是喜剧片里一个比较独特的女性视角了。

但我确实没什么鉴赏电影的水平也没法用我浅薄的文字准确写出我当时的感动。

因为感动过后我总觉得女主的那种心理状态和原生家庭伤害不是简单的一个男人的爱就可以治愈的 现实永远不会是rom-com 或许没必要用那么沉重的视角去看待这部电影。

————————————————————哦哦哦！

还有不得不提的是 Bill hader接吻的小动作真的好戳我——他会轻轻抚上女主的后颈。

他SNL的一些吻戏也会这么做 He is really a great kisser！！！！

首先哦，我是冲着Bill去的。

SNL时期，他是我最喜欢的卡司之一。

离开SNL后，就眼巴巴的期盼着他的各路电影。

首先看过的是和wiig姐崩溃姐弟，然后是和amy合作的头脑特工队，现在冲着男主的身份，又看完了两小时的爱情片。

总体来说，他的风格类似，似乎不像SNL时期给人印象深刻。

关注。

其次，女主艾米，喜欢啊。

之前只看过她在ellen秀的一些采访片段，想说怎么能有胖乎乎的这么有喜感的女孩子，看久了还能让人略有爱怜。

敢于自黑重口味的女谐星，好莱坞似乎不多。

特别是越看越性感的这种。

然后，是蒂尔达，浓烈的烟熏妆，好吧，我是完全习惯她的中性装扮，没认出来。

再然后，瓦妮莎、pete、leslie，客串出场，snl聚会吗？

再然后，森森感觉到詹姆斯的“感性”，外形和角色反差这么大，好玩。