爱若此时

这是我继《天佑鲍比》后，第二部哭得痛彻心扉的电影。

我被Rudy和Paul给予Marco无私而全身心的爱而打动，被他们为了让Marco有一个正常的家而拼尽全力的追求而打动，被他们一家三口曾经的美好时光而打动。

然而，就是这份为了孩子的倾心付出，却因为社会对同性恋的歧视而不得不被迫终止。

能给我讲个故事吗，我喜欢幸福的结局他是一个可爱、聪明、有趣的孩子，他的笑容可以照亮整个房间，他喜欢垃圾食品，巧克力甜甜圈是他最喜欢的东西，他是全世界最好的迪斯科舞者，他总爱抱着那个叫Ashley的洋娃娃，他喜欢每晚听一个故事，只要故事有幸福的结局。

这就是Marco，一个唐氏综合征孩子。

不幸的是，这个孩子的母亲是一个毒瘾极大的女人，她疯狂吸毒，带陌生人回家，对Marco从来都不管不顾。

直到有一天她被警察带走，留下Marco孤身在家，住在隔壁的Rudy发现了这个孩子。

他们是很棒的家长，有他们的地方才是Marco的家Marco被带到收养院，并且将一直在那个收养院待下去，因为没人会收养他，没人想收养一个矮矮胖胖、心智受损的孩子，整个世界没人想要他，除了Rudy和Paul。

Rudy发现这件事后，在Paul的帮助下，他们得到了Marco的临时监护权。

他们把Marco带回了自己的家，并将Marco视为己出，送Marco上学，辅导Marco学习，给Marco过生日。

可以明显的看出，他们投入了自己全部的爱给Marco，而这也Marco第一次感受到了家的温暖，让Marco第一次感受到到一个孩子应得的快乐与幸福。

愿Marco回家的路，不再有阻碍当Rudy与Paul的关系被曝光后，他们也失去了收养Marco的权利，因为在当时，在70年代的美国加州，法律不允许同性恋伴侣收养孩子。

但让人不可忍受的是，加州却允许有滥用药物和家庭暴力前科的人收养小孩。

可见当时社会对同性恋的歧视真的太大太深。

故事的最后，Marco的母亲提前保释出狱，要回了Marco的监护权，却仍然不知悔改，继续吸毒，不管Marco的生活。

Marco踏上了寻找家的道路，他想回到有Rudy与Paul的地方，回到能真的给他温暖和爱的地方。

不幸的是，他为找到回家的路一直走了三天，最终在一座桥下孤单地死去。

两个最爱Marco的人，那唯一知道他喜欢吃甜甜圈，喜欢听有幸福结尾故事，能看到Marco身上的光芒的人，却因为社会对同性恋的歧视而得不到对一个没有人会再关心他的唐氏综合征孩子的抚养权。

Marco想要回家，想要回到唯一能给予他平等的爱和对待的家，是这些令人发指的歧视，一次又一次阻挡了他回家的路。

愿Marco能记住这份无时无刻的爱，愿Marco离开的路不孤单。

他们说，一切都可以被取代他们说，一切距离都不相近我记得每一张脸每一个置我于此情此景的人我看到我的光芒开始闪亮从西方照到东方任何一刻，若是此时我将被释放他们说，他们说每个人都该保护好自己他们说，他们说每个人都会沦陷我发誓，我发誓看到了我的投影远远不只这些墙壁没错，我看到我的光芒在闪亮，在闪亮从西方照到东方我的天任何一刻，若是此时我将被释放是的，我看到我的光芒闪亮从西方照到东方我发誓，我发誓我发誓，我的爱我们会得到释放关于电影对应的真实故事电影编剧布卢姆（Bloom）透露：“ 《爱若此时》的电影剧本灵感来自真实故事，并非基于真实故事。

”他在30年前写了原始剧本。

当时，他在纽约的一个朋友向他介绍了一个叫Rudy的男同性恋。

Rudy住在一个小公寓里，几乎没有钱。

他结识了一个居住在几个街区之外的12岁男孩。

这个男孩已经被他的吸毒/妓女母亲遗弃，并与他的祖母住在一起。

祖母没有为这个不说话的男孩做多少事情。

他猜这个孩子是自闭症，但没有钱做任何事情。

于是Rudy把男孩带到他的公寓，确保他已经穿好衣服并被喂饱了，他竭尽所能让他上学。

最后，他把他养大了。

值得高兴的是，至少在现实生活中，这个故事是一个幸福的结局。

早在2004年我就真正切切的和同性恋一起吃过饭，没有传说中的污秽，所感受到的是一种纯净，如孩童般的纯净。

这几年看了几部同性电影，都觉得爱是美好的，《断背山》自不必说，李安把感情处理的很好，男人间爱的厚重和压抑，欲而不能的现实，让心像大山一样无言凝重，那感情多真啊，《养子15岁》是一部瑞典电影，宁静的乡村生活，平静的家长里短，同性的生活和其他的没什么不同，真正的是真爱无关性别，叛逆养子最后被爱感化。

《爱若此时》也是如此，影片很正面，两个男人为人正派，彼此相爱，平淡生活，一如寻常男女，可惜因为部分世俗的压力，他们的领养未能实现，可怜了Marco最终死在天桥下。

我讨厌部分人戴着道德伪君子的面罩，肆意的去践踏他人的情感，爱，不论同性、异性，无关乎年龄、学识、地位等各方面的差异，只要相爱，只要爱是真的，感情都该被尊重。

以下转载：Rudy是同志酒吧的异装舞者，他性感，热烈，活得洒脱有趣。

Paul让他讲述自己的故事，他用一首歌唱出自己的经历，如何生活艰辛，梦想被现实击碎。

Rudy像极了风月俏佳人里朱莉娅•罗伯茨饰演的女主角，如果他是个女人，一定追求者无数。

Paul是行迹于上层社会的律师。

他结过婚，拥有过自己的公司，但不甘于麻木不仁的生活。

于是离了婚，学习法律，他的梦想是改变世界。

Rudy和Paul一见钟情，他们彼此被对方的特质吸引，彼此深爱。

因为Rudy爱憎分明的一颗赤子之心，他们还意外得到了一个孩子——患有自闭症的男孩Marco。

Marco喜欢自己的芭比娃娃，喜欢吃垃圾食品，喜欢Rudy把自己当作主角编进故事里，虽然电影里Rudy的故事从来都只讲一个开头，但可以猜到，它一定有个好结局。

然而现实中的Marco却结局悲惨，Rudy和Paul的同志情侣关系被揭发后，Marco被生活淫乱的生母夺回抚养权，他最终走失，孤独死在一座桥下。

不是因为他出走后忘记了生母的住处，那条路他走过无数次；只是在他心里Rudy和Paul才是他的家，但因为世俗的干涉，那个家他再也回不去……影片根据真实事件改编，虽然情节涉及到儿童抚养权，但影片的重心并不在同性家庭是否有资格收养儿童这个比同性恋本身更复杂很多的问题。

Marco的作用还是拷问社会对同性情侣的不公正——因为和Rudy的关系被揭发，本来即将升迁的Paul丢掉了工作，同时他们失去了对Marco的抚养权，唯有Rudy唱歌的梦想侥幸没有被打破，他夜夜在酒吧，唱一首让人心碎的挽歌。

影片在很多时候显得情节失控，导致目的不明。

看完我仍然会困惑它到底想说的是同性恋受到不公正对待，还是同性情侣是否有资格收养小孩，再或者，是如何关爱特殊儿童。

作为探讨敏感问题的电影，本片显然力道不足，而导演耽于煽情，演员入戏过深长期飘在自high状态（尤其Rudy）更加重了煽情意味，也让电影更加绵软无力。

影片很多情节设计很像撑同片的典范费城，比如律师被发现是同志后丢掉工作，比如最后没有人愿意接同志的案子所以主角求助黑人律师。

但费城分分钟都是剑拔弩张的气势，汤姆•汉克斯为它掉的每一斤肉都是打在保守世俗脸上的响亮耳光。

而本片思想较费城并不失之毫厘，但力度却差之千里。

然而我相信，任何对于现存问题心怀诚意的探讨，都是有价值的。

至于有人提到的Rudy和Paul的情感发展缺乏铺垫，没有说服力，可以套用我一心思细腻的朋友对新版笑傲江湖的评价：剧情是狗血的，感情是真挚的。

嗯……

當我在看完預告的時候，就已經確信這是部非常棒的電影這是由一個真實故事改編的電影。

故事發生在70年代的美國，圍繞著一個患有唐氏綜合癥14歲的男孩Marco DeLeon展開。

故事的背景在同性戀者愛情的烘托下異常成功(注：70年代的美國對於同性戀相當歧視)。

因為這是一個炙手可熱、奪人眼眸的商業亮點，是曾加票房收入且吸人眾人的一個堅固題材，且能很好的達到讓觀眾產生共鳴并體會到他們在爭取撫養權時所受到不公平審判地痛苦、無奈。

但導演並沒有過度深入描寫同性戀的戀情，因這個亮點的背景是可被取代的，可以是從監獄出來的人，也可以是有複雜背景的人等等......電影在一開始就已Marco孤獨的背影展開，明確告訴觀眾這部電影的第一主角與主線就是Marco。

這個擁有燦爛笑容禮貌的男孩，天真可愛。

他用自己的方式安靜小巧的生存在這複雜的社會，雖然在智力方面不如正常人，但是也如常人那般渴望能擁有一個幸福溫暖的家，有真正疼愛他為他睡前講故事的人。

導演所刻畫的第二主角Rudy Donatello是個鮮明討人喜愛的人物，在導演一步步把Ruby對於Marco的愛緩緩帶出後，讓觀眾更能投入到Ruby那份對Marco的真摯愛中。

Ruby在影片里親自演唱的3首歌曲"Come to Me" " Love Don't live Here Anymore" "I Shall Be Released" 貫穿整部電影。

導演在歌曲方面的安排不僅純粹只是電影插曲，而是以Ruby的方式更好的帶出他對Marco深厚的愛。

歌曲成為電影重要的一部份完全融入其中，很是難得。

檢察官Paul Fleiger，雖然導演並沒有過多深入述說他的背景，但依舊成功讓觀眾對Paul有一種難以言說的敬佩之情。

我想大家都會記得這個畫面，Paul一臉認真的教導Marco做功課，從他眼中就可以感受到他對Marco滿滿的真摯的愛。

當然還有他在法庭堅定不移的言語，字字入人心。

他是個絕對成功且不用過多刻畫的第三主角。

但整部影片最讓我感覺驚喜的是，導演用了一個如此平靜的方式來宣洩他對於這個社會不公義現象的哀歎。

影片最後，Paul在信裏告訴每一個反對他們爭取Marco撫養權的人，認真描述給他們聽Marco是一個怎樣惹人喜愛的善良孩子。

他並不是寫信指責他們做錯了什麽，而是嘗試讓他們瞭解Marco是一個怎樣的孩子，因為他們從來都沒有機會認識Marco。

Paul所希望的是，當他們真的瞭解後可以明白Marco所真正需要的是什麽。

雖已然沒有什麽能再為Marco做的了，但至少在以後，當再次出現類似的Case，能請寬容對待。

這就是導演的魅力之處，也是最最成功之處。

那些反面的角色不是叫人來憎恨的，而是叫人來反思的。

我很感激導演在這部電影上花的所有一切心血，雖然身為商業片但導演非常成功傳遞了他所想要帶給觀眾們明確的信息。

最後，我想分享一下對「And Day Now」 這個名字的看法："Any Day" 在我們平凡生活里的每一天，都會有無數向Marco這樣的人身處在我們彼此的身邊。

而"Now"，此刻的你能為他們做的或許看似微小，但對於他們卻是最大的，最為珍貴的。

台詞精髓：At the court， Paul say：『This hearing is about Marco. who at this very moment is sitting in some foster home. and who will sit in some foster home forever. because no one want to adopt him. No one wants to adopt some short, fat, mentally handicapped kid. No one in this entire world wants him...except us. We want him. We love him. We'll take care of him and educate him, keep him safe and raise him to be a good man. Isn't that what he deserves? Isn't that what every child deserves?』http://blog.qooza.hk/chenfeng

　　我也不觉得这片子有多好或者有多没有重点..但我的视觉就像一直就是处于男猪脚的视觉 去审视这个熟悉但又极度令人绝望 充满不甘的世界 那时候的同性恋都是自卑的.弱小的 无助的 律师男一直的逃避很好的印证着..我们不妨再想一下石墙 想一下鲍比 米尔克 差不多都是这个时代的吧.（记不太清楚） 可就因为这样对未知的恐惧 对无法预测的不放心和对所谓“平常人”不同的行事 就急着保护自己，从最开始的警官掏枪威吓到后来的贱人D.A和反方律师 完全就是要把同性恋往死里整..但最后失去的却是那个周旋在他们“斗争”下的孩子..一个唐氏综合征患者 一个只是想回家和吃最爱的甜甜圈而别无所求的小孩 那帮正常人失去的是作为人所必需的良心. 在这场斗争中 那些所谓的“正常人”变得连狗都不如 狗尚且会抉择谁对他好..他们连最起码的判断力都被歧视所吞没 我最记忆尤深的是女法官的陈词 那里面就是赤裸裸的歧视 我不明白什么叫做同性恋行为会影响孩子认为同性恋是正常的 那么一男一女在孩子面前吸毒做爱就应该是正常的 两个男人从心底里爱护着孩子 给他最好的 一直保护他照顾他 一起留下完美的记忆就是“不正常” 其实对于正常人来说那孩子也早就因为智障而被歧视 被归为“不正常”对待了吧..我还能说什么呢这世界真TM疯狂!!!

该电影是反映同性恋的一部情感影片。

影片单身流浪汉主人公鲁迪和离婚的弗雷格在酒吧认识后陷入同性恋之中，而鲁迪的邻居马可是个唐氏综合症患者，其母亲吸毒后被送入监狱，而鲁迪不愿意弱智的马可被带到社会福利抚养院，他设法打动身为律师的弗雷格一同与他取得了马可的监护权。

但由于他们的同性恋关系被法庭知道，虽然他们三人一直过着幸福的生活，但经过多次的法律官司，最终马可离开了他们，又过上了类似流浪的生活……影片成功之处在于两个男同性恋主人公的社会正义感，以及对弱智少年的关怀令人感动，演员的演技也尚可。

不足之处在于支持并宣扬一个同性恋的家庭，多少出人意外。

如果真正地将在酒吧反串演技的鲁迪换作一个女人，那么加上爱情的真挚，可能影片会感动更多的人。

但这将失去现存影片的主题。

两天前，晚间节目，找了一个主题聊天。

你这一生中必须要做的事。

在网上查找答案，都是人生中要做的100件事，1000件事。

孝顺父母。

去一次XX地。

做一件让自己难忘的事。

我的本意不是这样的。

我说的意思是，你一定要去做的一件事。

是你现在可能做不了，但你以后一定会做到的。

别的事都可以不做，但惟独这件事，你在心里默默地说，我一定会做到。

在别人眼中极为普通，在你这里却尤为重要的一件事。

比如，我要考上某某学校。

比如，我一定要结婚。

比如，我一定要去蹦极。

比如，我一定要去山区支教。

比如，我一定要做一名志愿者。

比如，我一定要领养一个孩子。

好了，电影之外的事就说到这里。

电影开头，我就被这名长发，媚眼如丝的男人吸引住了。

看似滑稽，举止间却流露妩媚的装扮。

好听的歌曲，认真的演出。

然后是莫名其妙的，KJ了。

我在想，你会和一个第一次见面就KJ的人约会吗？

舞台上的鲁迪光鲜亮丽，现实中的他却如此落魄。

明明观众席与舞台只是一步之遥，为何相差甚远。

好像通过他的生计与生活，要反射出后来他领养孩子的问题。

现实与想象，也是遥不可及。

但是，为什么偏偏是这个孩子？

看上去就是一副有问题，大有问题的样子。

不能选择一个古灵精怪，或者身世更惨的孩子吗？

后来，我终于明白，为什么是他。

正因为，你要知道领养一个不能寄托于任何希望的“病儿”，是需要多么大的勇气。

没有任何血缘，任何关系，任何故事，任何原因，只是单纯的遇见，知晓这样的事情，从心往外的有一种怜悯感，然后让你为之付出全部的努力，去换取一个已知的未来。

最重要的是，他不需要任何回报。

而，这个善举，也让他赢得了珍贵的爱情。

当保罗把录音机送给鲁迪时，并说，这是你应得的。

我就再也不想计较鲁迪在上班前脸上露出的那种疲惫了。

也许，他看似苦涩的笑容里还包含着一丝幸福与甜蜜。

真正的爱情应该是什么样的呢。

应该是他看穿你的才能，知晓你的梦想，支撑你的精神。

这样看来，你要做些什么呢？

只有全力以赴的去达成你心中的梦想，这样你爱的人和爱你的人才不会失望。

两个生活本就不易的人，相遇了，又在路边拾到一个包袱，小心翼翼谨慎努力地为之奋斗，这样的故事很多，能善终的不多。

也许，保罗只是在鲁迪身上看到了自己没有的，所以他愿意投入全部精力，去实现自己永远不能达到的梦想。

也许，我们每个人都有一个不能实现的目标，却总能在别人的生活发现惊喜。

所以，我们愿意为之倾心，为之无怨无悔的付出。

可是，当理想遇见现实，你又如何改变世界？

当你的温饱都成问题，当你的心爱之物已被剥夺，你还有愿意力气与世界抗衡吗？

就算没有了家庭的束缚，不顾及外人的目光，却依然有些程序不得不继续。

这就是现实与理想的差距，你以为一马平川的路上，永远都会只为你一人开着绿灯吗？

但，若不用爱与努力继续前进，那么你的方向终究会变成一个死角。

这一生，你有哪些一定要做的事？

拼上性命也要完成的？

若你想要改变世界，首先记得，不要改变自己。

就像，鲁克行为。

【马克喜欢幸福的结局。

他分得清该听谁的话，不该听谁的话。

他知道哪里才是他真正的家。

】P.S.最后，我只在思考，是否一个人对另一个人的爱，真的可以如此纯粹毫无理由。

简单的付出，简单的关爱，简单的依赖，简单的信任。

我相信你，在不远的将来，给我的承诺，一定会做到。

无力吐槽了，结局已经让我身心俱碎。。

肚子疼+哭了一整晚。。

以为，唉，不是所有真人真事都有一个你希望的结局。

给这部戏4星的原因是因为1、没有过分的情色镜头2、通过真人真事改编不能给五星的原因同性恋题材最后不想多说，因为是真事，所以对这个世界的恨意又多了一层。

我看到众豆友的评论时，也忍不住发表一下自己的看法。

这是一部很好的电影，在我心中，好电影就是看完之后，总能给你留下点感觉，那种感觉或许是美好的，忧伤的，快乐的，失落的.......但是总是有一种感觉，改变了你对某些事物的看法。

有人说这部影片在很多时候显得情节失控，导致目的不明。

其实我想说，应该说我相信，看完这部影片的人应该都会感觉到，同性恋有权利得到孩子的抚养权，因为他们就是普通人，甚至比一部分普通人更有爱。

当每个人都能产生有这种感觉，就说明这个电影已经成功的表达了它想表达的意思，传播了它的正能量。

电影中让我印象深刻的是黑人律师对鲁迪和保罗的一句话：在加利福利亚甚至允许有滥用药物和家庭暴力前科的人收养小孩，而你们不行。

看了一下电影资料，电影的背景设定在70年代，其实可想而知那时候人们对同性恋的不了解与深深的厌恶，无处不在。

电影中很多细节就反应了，如保罗丢了工作，他们其实找了很多律师却都没有人愿意帮他们，法官的一再刁难，与马可老师的担忧...让我始终感动的是他们的努力，他们没有放弃，他们的生活已经很艰难，他们知道他们要面对的，但是他们始终没有放弃...如果你懂得就好。

有人说鲁迪和保罗的感情发展的太快了，没有铺垫。

怎么说能，我曾经也喜欢过同性，只是她的突然回头对我的一个微笑，我就迷恋了她3年。

如果你也有过这种一见钟情的感觉，你就懂得。

其实鲁迪每次在台上唱歌时，都让我觉得惊艳，他的自信让我觉得那时的他比一个女人都美。

人很容易爱上与他自身性格相反的人，保罗严谨，善于克制自己，甚至可以看出他有点小内向，我相信他一看到自信，欢快，善良，执着，无时无刻可以展现自身才华的鲁迪时，他很容易一见钟情，并陪伴他做其实自己也想做而曾经没有勇气做的事情。

这个故事很简单，一切进行的很缓慢很自然，但是不是幸福的结局。

如果这个故事曾是真的，那30年后的今天，马可一样的孩子，遇到鲁迪和保罗一样的他们，这将是一段温馨的喜剧。

这个故事让我们知道，每段历史，都有一段时间的错误，但有像鲁迪和保罗他们那样的人，不断努力，终将改变这段错误。

就如我们现在的认知。

Alan Cumming Has Never Been BetterThe story of Any Day Now may take place in the past, but the discrimination against same-sex families it depicts is unfortunately still all too real.BY DIANE ANDERSON-MINSHALL JANUARY 04 2013 5:00 AM ET George Arthur Bloom lived in Brooklyn in the late 1970s, back when it was a rough-and-tumble area. He was inspired by a larger-than-life character everyone seemed to know, Rudy, who developed a fatherly relationship with, as filmmaker Travis Fine puts it, a “kid who was terribly handicapped, both mentally and physically” and whose mother was a drug addict. Bloom turned Rudy’s real-life experience into a screenplay, which almost got filmed several times during the ensuing years (at one point Tommy Lee Jones and Sylvester Stallone were attached to it). Then it went nowhere, Bloom gave up, and it sat in a drawer until his son, an old high school friend of Fine’s, showed the director the script.The movie that came of it, Any Day Now, which hit theaters this winter and garnered awards on the festival circuit, follows The Good Wife’s Alan Cumming as Rudy, Raising Hope’s Garret Dillahunt as Paul, the closeted attorney who becomes his partner, and Isaac Leyva as Marco, a teen with Down syndrome who’s abandoned by his mother and taken in by the men. They all must fight a biased legal system so the couple can adopt Isaac, a heart-wrenching storyline that will resonate with many of the 2 to 6 million LGBT people who say they’d like to adopt.“The story of Any Day Now may take place in the past, but the discrimination against same-sex families it depicts is unfortunately still all too real in some parts of our country,” says GLAAD president Herndon Graddick.It’s real too for kids like Marco. As of 2011 there were 104,236 children in foster care awaiting adoption, many of them considered special-needs children because they are black or Latino, are older than infants, or have some form of mental or physical disability. “What the film’s remarkable performances and eloquent script reveal, though, is how unjust and hurtful to same-sex couples and children that discrimination really is,” Graddick adds.Cumming, whose performance is riveting and one of his most inspired, talks about making the film.I found Any Day Now just completely absorbing and really moving. And I notice people just seem to really have a gut reaction to the film. Why do you think it reaches people that way? I think that we see the story of people who are damaged and devastated by bigotry and prejudice and ignorance. And we understand how wrong that is because we’ve invested in these characters and we want them to be together. And then I think in a larger way, we know that the reason that happened is because that bigotry and that prejudice still exist in our society. And I think we are so moved by it because we know that we are complicit in that because we are all members of that society.This is a story about many things — about family, the foster care system, and coming out, but at the heart of it, it’s a love story between your free-spirited Rudy and Garret’s buttoned-down, closeted Paul. How did you develop the sort of chemistry that viewers see between you and Garret on-screen? We just had to fake it, because we didn’t know each other. It was very well-written. and obviously Garret is a really brilliant actor and we luckily felt very comfortable with each other and got on. And I think that’s half of it. Once you feel comfortable with someone you can just dive in. But you’d imagine we’d have lots of time to talk and get comfortable with each other. No, we were practically in bed on the first day.One of the other parts of the film that we don’t see a lot of — but is so true — is that there’s so much difficulty over same-sex couples trying to adopt. But the reality is there are a ton of children and teenagers, especially with physical or mental disabilities, that will just languish in the system.Absolutely right. And that to me is the biggest idea—because everyone falls in love with Isaac. Garret says at one point, “I’m just hoping that this child doesn’t slip through the cracks in the system,” and sadly he does.Tell me about working with Isaac. Oh, it was great. I loved it. I mean people think…you’re going to make a movie with someone who has a learning disability, what’s that going to mean? I had no idea. But I just went into it…with an open heart. And he was just an absolute darling and so lovely.… He’s got kind of openness to him and…he’s not at all jaded. Everything there’s pure, and it kind of reminded me of what acting should be like. Everything’s really on the surface and completely authentic.That's great. You have some scenes of just real heartbreak and anguish. Was there anything in your own life that you could call on to sort of nail those scenes? To inspire?Well, yes. I have had heartbreak and anguish in my life. That's not difficult for me to access.So, ten years ago, we used to ask straight actors if they had any hesitation about playing a gay role. Now it's more common to ask gay actors if they worry about being pigeonholed. This is certainly not your first gay role, but do you ever worry about that?No, I actually don't. I mean, [I'm] playing a straight man on TV every Monday. I just don't deal with that. I mean, I've played gay people, but I don't know the percentage. I just I don't think much in that way, you know. I don't correlate it in that way. But I'm drawn to the stories and the character's heart, you know. And perhaps because… I'm comfortable with it, I'm likely to be offered things, I could see people know that I would be more ready to be comfortable with doing it. But I don't worry at all. I'm not really a worrier. I refuse.That's great. So assuming they met somehow, what would Rudy think about Eli, your character on Good Wife?I think… in terms of the story, I think he'd probably try to see what he could do to help his situation. I think probably they might lock horns a little bit initially because they're both quite sensitive types. But I imagine that, you know, they might get on eventually because they look so alike. That was a joke.What’s the most critical thing for you to get across with this film? What do you want people to take away from it? I want people to…have a real emotional experience and an emotional connection. But really…I want people to go away and think, Wow, look at the effect of prejudice and ignorance and bigotry, and look at how much our society is still engendering and encouraging that. Speaking of, you and your husband, Grant, got married earlier this year in New York. What are your thoughts on the recent marriage equality successes? I think it’s great that we have a president who is very vocal in his support of equality and gay rights. I think the last election is really exciting in that it showed that the country was rejecting all that sort of prejudice and fear-based prejudice. We’re still the second-class citizens. And people still can be fired for being gay and people are gay-bashed.… So, you know, I don’t mean to be ungrateful but I don’t see why I should be so grateful for my rights. I think that’s what we should all remember.I have one last question. You have a book coming out in 2013: May the Foreskin Be With You. I read a little excerpt from it and it made me want to ask, what made you want to talk so intimately about your penis and other people's penises?Because I was shocked when I first came to America, [and] I realized that the people who were seeing my penis were so utterly ignorant of what a real penis — a normal, intact penis —looks like. I thought, God, I'm here, I'm in New York City, this progressive, cultural, melting-pot of the world, and these people don't realize that they are genitally mutilated as children. And that was really what got me going, I was like, this is how it's supposed to be. And then I've [found] out more about it, and saw all the things about lack of sensation that people have, and I became aware of that because you just are aware that people with their circumcised penises are less sensitive. And so it just became a cause for me, really. And then of course you find out all these things about how the circumcisions can go so horribly wrong, and how these poor kids have terrible, terrible things happen. I've been in situations where I've been in a car, and me and an interviewer are talking about the book or other things, and the driver will go, "I heard you speaking and you know, my circumcision went wrong and I… pee out of two holes."And I think it's this unspoken thing, of men, that don't want to talk about it and they certainly don't want to be told something that irretrievable, irreversible. It's so wrong and they're losing so much. Also, it's fighting the medical system that [doesn't want to] admit they're wrong, and they don't want to lose the money that every circumcision brings them. To me, it seems to me this huge conspiracy. And actually … if it was girl circumcision, I mean female genital mutilation, we would be horrified about it. And we are, when it happens.Yes, [female circumcision] is illegal here, yeah.Yes, so why is it? If anything happens to thousands of little boys and we think that's okay.Yeah. And there always seems to be the excuse that a boy's penis should look like his father's. I hear that again and again. To which I think, do you go home get your cocker in front of your dad? I didn't. Is that an American custom? Because I don't think that's right, if it is. -Dillahunt, who plays the often clueless but nonetheless progressive and lovable Burt Chance on Raising Hope, isn't new to playing gay and bisexual characters. But this film, he says, is special. He tells us why.I found Any Day Now completely absorbing and really moving and viewers seem to have a real, visceral reaction to the film. Why do you think that is?I guess, hopefully, they find it honest and relatable. I think, despite the specific circumstances these characters are going through, there's a lot of common ground.This is a story about family, the foster care system, disability, coming out and so on. But at the heart it’s a love story between your button down closeted character, Paul, and Alan Cumming’s free-spirited drag performer, Rudy. What was most critical to you to get across in the film?That these were living, breathing human beings. The whole thing will fall apart, obviously, if the audience doesn't believe the love between these two, seemingly, opposites.Ten years ago, we used to ask straight actors if they had any hesitation about playing a gay role but not so much any more. So I’m wondering what made you want to take on this role?I just thought it was a challenge. I like mixing it up as much as I can, and Paul was much different from the previous character I'd played, and I thought it would be fun to tackle. The icing on the cake is that it's a beautiful story with themes that are, sadly, still resonant today. Who wouldn't want to be a part of that?I love that while Paul is really navigating new territory as a gay or bisexual man, the film certainly isn’t just a traditional coming out narrative. There’s no big “I am gay” scene, for example. Was there sort of awareness that Paul’s coming out was almost secondary to what was happening with Marco?Yes. I think the center of this story is Marco. Rudy is an incredibly tough guy — he's a drag queen in the '70s, for Christ's sake. It is almost unsurprising that he would take Marco under his wing. I think his comfort as a gay man is something Paul envies. Probably one of the things that attracts him to Rudy, this unapologetic "gayness" and willingness to fight — it brings out Paul's quieter strength. And the catalyst is this boy.It’s hard not to think this film as a modern Kramer vs Kramer. Dustin Hoffman’s character loses his job to care for the kid; Rudy does the same. Hoffman and Streep go to court to battle for custody; Paul and Rudy do the same. Though it’s set in the 1970s, the storyline feels particularly timely as Kramer did when it came out. What do you think of comparisons like that?I don't mind them. I suppose they're going to happen however I feel about it.My sister-in-law has Down syndrome so it was lovely to see a storyline about a teen with Down syndrome. Tell me about working with Isaac, who plans Marco in the film.Isaac was terrific. He was excited and joyful, prepared, and serious. He'd shush Alan and I if we were too goofy when Travis was about to call "action." He gives great hugs and listens — which makes him a great actor. He really reminded me why I do this, and how I should do this. He shamed me, truthfully. And I am so grateful.What about working with Alan. How did you develop enough trust to connect so easily in the film? You have great chemistry.We got on well, didn't we? We seem like a couple. I wish I had a great story to tell you — some incredible bonding experience or conversation we had prior to filming that clicked everything into place. But we didn't have time for that. We met at the wig fitting and got to work. I guess we're professionals! Sometimes it's easy, though. Alan is real easy to act with. We share a belief, I think, that if you're not having fun, why do it? And it is fun, no matter how harrowing the scene, when it works. And with Alan, it works every time. Heh, he'll love that quote.http://www.advocate.com/print-issue/current-issue/2013/01/04/alan-cumming-has-never-been-betterhttp://www.advocate.com/arts-entertainment/film/2012/12/13/garret-dillahunt-tackles-gay-adoption-any-day-now

我也不觉得这片子有多好或者有多没有重点..但我的视觉就像一直就是处于男猪脚的视觉 去审视这个熟悉但又极度令人绝望 充满不甘的世界 那时候的同性恋都是自卑的.弱小的 无助的 律师男一直的逃避很好的印证着..我们不妨再想一下石墙 想一下鲍比 米尔克 差不多都是这个时代的吧.（记不太清楚） 可就因为这样对未知的恐惧 对无法预测的不放心和对所谓“平常人”不同的行事 就急着保护自己，从最开始的警官掏枪威吓到后来的贱人D.A和反方律师 完全就是要把同性恋往死里整..但最后失去的却是那个周旋在他们“斗争”下的孩子..一个唐氏综合征患者 一个只是想回家和吃最爱的甜甜圈而别无所求的小孩 那帮正常人失去的是作为人所必需的良心. 在这场斗争中 那些所谓的“正常人”变得连狗都不如 狗尚且会抉择谁对他好..他们连最起码的判断力都被歧视所吞没 我最记忆尤深的是女法官的陈词 那里面就是赤裸裸的歧视 我不明白什么叫做同性恋行为会影响孩子认为同性恋是正常的 那么一男一女在孩子面前吸毒做爱就应该是正常的 两个男人从心底里爱护着孩子 给他最好的 一直保护他照顾他 一起留下完美的记忆就是“不正常” 其实对于正常人来说那孩子也早就因为智障而被歧视 被归为“不正常”对待了吧..我还能说什么呢这世界真TM疯狂!!!

电影看的越来越多，但哭得愈来愈少了。

不过这部电影泪点太多了，无尿点，多高潮，总感觉自己猜到了结局，却总又是峰回路转了。

这类题材的电影本身就很打动人，而且不乏优秀的作品，但是这部从情节到配乐到演员，几乎没有失分的部分。

从一开始一个烂俗的偶遇，一路演得催人泪下，着实让人心碎。

不是每个故事都会是Happy Ending！

这个故事也是一样.......Justice从来都只不过是多数人的游戏，而少数人连参与的资格都没有，但往往都是这少数人才应该被公平和正义去眷顾。

请大家不要带着有色眼镜去看这个世界，因为这个世界本来就是五颜六色的！

这不是一个单纯的同性电影，它讲述得是公平正义与爱的原动力。

摘掉你的有色眼镜去看看，也许你会发现，人都是人......