瑞士军刀男

我一直觉得我脑洞挺大的，但是看了即将在全美公映的电影《瑞士军人》的预告片。

我败了！

败得彻底！

电影讲述了一个男人遗落荒岛的故事。

（如果你以为是《荒岛求生》那种电影，那你就错了）

男人到了这个岛上，第一就想到的就是自杀！

但是绳子不结实，怎么也死不了。。。。

然后他就造出很多工具求生，还遇到一个野人星期五？

不是啦！！！！

也不是《鲁宾逊漂流记》啦！！！

怎么都死不了的时候，他在岛上发现了一具尸体。

<图片3>有了尸体生活变得好奇妙，总之他就彻底玩儿开了！

（尸体一脸生无可恋）<图片4>反正无聊，他没事儿就玩人家尸体的前面

或者用尸体肚子里的气，喷火。。。

没听懂？

就是玩儿尸体后面的意思

连嘴也不放过

岛上也没人啊，他就只能和尸体聊聊天儿

背他出去散散步<图片9>甚至还搞变装paly这种羞耻的活动<图片10>有时候下海<图片11>有时候还上天

这还不算会玩儿，他还用人家尸体造各种工具（尸体好可怜，想为尸体维权）<图片13>比如说，用尸体来储存水<图片14>用尸体喷射子弹<图片15>用尸体砍木头<图片16>用尸体咬绳子<图片17>拿人家尸体当摩托艇<图片18>高兴了也带着尸体一起喝酒<图片19>和尸体在小岛相处的这段时间，他和尸体成为了好朋友。

（注意尸体此时的表情）<图片20>各种脑洞大开的花式玩尸体之后，他也得到自我救赎，最后带着尸体一起离开了小岛。

<图片21>这部电影在圣丹斯电影节上已经拿下最佳导演奖。

导演丹·关和丹尼尔·施纳特，之前拍过许多短片和MV，这是他们第一次拍电影长片，第一次拍就拿了最佳导演奖。

<图片22>虽然这部电影6月末开始在美国点映，7月才全国上映，但预告片一出就吸引力很多人注意，被列为“2016最值得期待的电影之一”。

不仅仅是因为电影脑洞大开节操全掉的剧情，更重要的是电影里的两位主角。

首先是扮演尸体的丹尼尔·雷德克里夫，这位哈利波特大兄弟伏地魔整来整去都不死，但在这部电影里一出现就是个尸体。

<图片23>但他扮演的这个尸体真的是各种遭罪，本来想躺着赚钱却被翻来覆去的搞，心疼。

片场爆出的各种照片也能看到哈利波特呆萌里的藏不住的心酸。

<图片25>丹尼尔·雷德克里夫一直不愿被固定在哈利波特的形象里。

这几年人家一直尝试各种大胆的角色，反正没有颜值的后顾之忧，任性玩儿。

《维克多·弗兰肯斯坦》里演一个驼背的疯狂科学怪人。

《复仇之角》里因为亵渎神明，结果头上长出犄角。

<图片27>也曾在《杀死汝爱》里文艺地和众美男子搞基。

<图片28>《黑衣女人》里面不仅老婆死了，还老是遇见鬼，惨惨哒。

（没有魔杖，只好拿板斧）<图片29>19岁的时候还在舞台剧《狂马恋》里面和马搞过。

<图片30>靠着《哈利波特》丹尼尔·雷德克里夫赚了一辈子都花不完的钱，2015年他因6600万英镑的身家顺利登上英国《周日泰唔士报》的年度富人冠军。

这笔钱里不仅有他的片酬，丹尼尔除了拍戏外，他还成立公司管理事业与投资，18岁就在纽约买了3栋房子当起“房东”，此外还投资股票，既会赚又会理。

说他的世界上最有“钱途”的年轻演员一点都不为过。

这个有钱又勇敢的大男孩简直就把电影圈当成他了游乐园了！

<图片31><图片32>在《瑞士军人》里另一位主演就是保罗·达诺，作为美国独立电影界冉冉升起的新星，保罗·达诺的一举一动都引人注目。

《瑞士军人》里保罗·达诺这个在孤岛里满脸大胡子的角色很容易让人联想到《荒野猎人》里的小李子。

小李子凭借《荒野猎人》终于拿到奥斯卡了，同样奥斯卡也“欠”保罗·达诺一个说法。

<图片34>2006年22岁的保罗·达诺凭借《阳光小美女》扮演脆弱又古怪的哥哥一炮走红。

《阳光小美女》这一家子虽然都怪里怪气的，但人家可是十足的“奥斯卡家庭”，这家人里除了哥哥，每个人都有奥斯卡提名。。。。。。

求哥哥心理阴影面积。

“妹妹”阿比盖尔·布蕾斯琳2006年凭《阳光小美女》提名奥斯卡最佳女配角。

“爸爸”格雷戈·金尼尔1998年凭《尽善尽美》提名奥斯卡最佳男配角。

“妈妈”托妮·科莱特2000年凭《第六感》提名奥斯卡最佳女配角。

“舅舅”史蒂夫·卡瑞尔2015年评《狐狸猎手》提名奥斯卡最佳男主角。

“爷爷”艾伦·阿金拥有四次奥斯卡提名，因《阳光小美女》获得奥斯卡最佳男配角。

可怜的哥哥，啥也没有。

哥哥虽然是家里唯一没有奥斯卡提名的，但人家这几年在电影圈的发展确实最好的。

短短十年出演了一大堆经典电影。

演完《阳光小美女》后的第二年，保罗·达诺就在《血色将至》里用精彩的表演让人刮目相看。

这部电影在奥斯卡提名了8个奖项（包括最佳影片），而丹尼尔·戴-刘易斯获得影帝的时候，获奖视频播放的就是他和保罗·达诺在教堂里的对手戏。

<图片38>2008年他出现在李安导演的《制造伍德斯托克音乐节》里，不再是《血色将至》里的一肚子坏水，而是软绵绵地躺在男主角怀中。

之后他在《成为弗林》演帅气的作家，奥斯卡影帝罗伯特·德尼演他的父亲，奥斯卡影后朱丽安·摩尔演他的母亲。

反正除了保罗·达诺本人，他的合作者都有奥斯卡<图片40>2013年他在《为奴十二载》里出演歹毒的农场帮手，真是让人恨的牙痒痒，由于老是演坏人保罗·达诺已经被封为“美国男版容嬷嬷”了。

《为奴十二载》获得了奥斯卡最佳影片奖。

这是24岁的保罗·达诺在7年内第3次出演提名奥斯卡最佳影片奖的作品，好想给他颁个最佳吉祥物奖。

去年保罗·达诺在电影《爱与慈悲》里又唱又跳，饰演60年代著名流行乐团“海滩男孩”的主唱。

这部电影里保罗·达诺的表演被《时代周刊》誉为“年度十大表演”第五名。

同时他也提名金球奖、美国评论家选择奖、美国独立精神奖等多个奖项。

但，就是没有提名奥斯卡。

（小李子，来比比谁惨）<图片42>今年保罗·达诺不仅有粉丝非常期待的《瑞士军人》，主演的新版《战争与和平》也已经开播，在豆瓣目前评分8.2。

<图片43>

目前保罗·达诺正在拍摄奉俊昊导演继《雪国列车》后第二部好莱坞作品《玉子》，合作的演员有攻死人不偿命的蒂尔达·斯文顿，和杰克·吉伦哈尔。

今年是《阳光小美女》上映十周年，你们说保罗·达诺能凭届脑洞大开的《瑞士军人》获得奥斯卡提名吗？！！！！！

提名男配角还不行吗！！！

难道让演尸体的丹尼尔·雷德克里夫提名影帝？！

我这脑洞也是够了。

<图片46>扫描二维码，关注[不散]，更多精彩

一部影片的绝妙从取片名开始！

观影后，平生第一次在豆瓣写评论，此片在笔者心中值得9分。

影片叫瑞士军刀男，看完整部影片回过头来看片名，怎一个赞了得。

瑞士军刀作为现代文明产物，它是一把军刀，在现代文明社会意识形态的约束下，瑞士军刀的功能被限制，因为我们不可能用一把瑞士军刀去猎杀生命，它也许更多的时候被关在礼品盒中，然而瑞士军刀的自身属性在原始文明中将被无限放大使用，影片正是抓住了瑞士军刀这样一种能够充分象征现代文明和原始文明的真实存在，影片名字中的“男”字是点睛之笔，将瑞士军刀拟人化处理，从而投射一个人的本我与超我之间的关系，一把瑞士军刀的正确使用是没有任何说明书的，使用瑞士军刀的人想怎么用就怎么用，在文明社会语境下但又不能这么用和那么用，正如同本片男主一直生活在超我与本我的斗争当中，使得自己在他人看起来是如此失败也因此是个孤独症患者，也许当我们承认自己并敢于面对内心中最原始的本我之时，相信你就能成为自己的瑞士军刀男，成为一个与社会下的超我与人之初的本我和解的自我，生命过程中就是在不断完成对自我的探索和认知，这是笔者观影后对影片及片名的一些想法，这次很纯粹的去表达，没有打了许多文字后又觉得怕被人认为觉得自己写得不咋地，而没有选择去做，我想这正是这部影片带给我的改变与力量，让笔者顿时感觉生活轻松了许多。

大一入学的第一个月看的这部电影，来自一个作家普二丁的微博推荐。

当时的B站还可以看这种大尺度的片子，看完之后好久才听说这具尸体是丹尼尔演的，没有一点哈利波特的影子。

不过还是蛮帅的🤭，让电影的浪漫氛围有了颜值基础hihi荒诞却又充满了浪漫。

那时我的心理状态还很糟糕，看完这部电影之后觉得被深深地治愈了。

找到了当时的说说，记录一下：great&crazy绝境之处新生的感觉，治愈灵魂的神启。

从黑暗的深渊中走出，一个梦幻的世界。

“因为总有一天，你变的屎，会和我变的屎相遇。

”多么恶心、怪异，却又该死的浪漫啊。

我知道这是关于一个男人和一具万能尸体的故事，我知道这是独立电影，我觉得这是脑洞喜剧，然后我抱着零食点开看。

没想到边笑边哭，连小包辣条都没吃完。

Hank流落荒岛，一看就是纯纯的屌丝。

如此孤独，如此想自杀。

然后他面前出现了一具不断放屁的尸体，便决定不死了。

Hank骑上他的尸体喷气式快艇，在海面驰骋。

他要回到文明世界，回到有人的地方去。

“你想回去是因为你想有人爱你？

”“对。

”“所以你逃离世界是因为没人爱你？

”“……”蛋妮演的尸体叫Manny，他善于问一些直白（尴尬）的问题。

他复活，像个婴儿，一无所知但又无所不知。

什么是爱？

什么是性？

为什么我看到姑娘想和她嘴贴嘴？

Manny在交谈中让Hank梳理了人生，重新认识自己。

他的屁好比推进器，他的响指可以点火，他的勃起是指南针，他的呕吐能当枪使。

他还能和Hank过家家，还原恋爱故事。

在Manny这里，屎尿屁是优点，不用遮拦。

他帮助Hank最终回到了人类社会。

ET对手指，这里对，咳。

但这都是假的。

Manny是Hank分裂的人格，他们根本不在荒岛上，Hank暗恋的女人连孩子都有了。

Hank依旧是人们眼中的废物、怪人、精神病患者，还更疯了。

是的，没人爱他，只有尸体爱他。

人们还要把尸体运走。

“我很抱歉，我只是想给你其他人生活中所拥有的一切，以及那些在遇见你之前我觉得自己不配拥有的东西，他们可能会笑话我们，可能会用奇怪的绰号称呼我们，可能会觉得我们很奇怪，但是他们想什么都不重要了。

我只请求……你不要死。

”Hank也爱他的尸体。

这他妈的根本不是一个温情励志故事。

Hank的手工真厉害。

一个人为自己造出一个部落。

要假发有假发，要房子有房子，要公交有公交，要电影院有电影院，自给自足。

他和Manny在这里狂欢，日日都有新游戏。

点起火，唱一首轻快的小调，笑啊。

多令人心酸而骄傲的快乐：我一个人，挺好的。

Hank从小性格忧郁，母亲去世后，他把自己封闭起来，甚至不再自慰。

父亲视他为弱智。

Hank暗恋每天坐同一班车的Sarah，却从没和她说过一句话。

Sarah结婚了，Hank感到绝望，就隐居在莎拉家背后的“荒岛”上。

他从没离开过文明世界，但他也从没进入过。

他和Manny的小天地看起来比外面更温暖。

幸好他造出了Manny。

他让他想活下来，他和他交谈，他帮他渡过难关，他尊敬他。

他们的吻是一场自我救赎的自慰。

不爱自己，怎么活。

“你不能随便和人搭话，不能随便在别人面前唱歌，不能在别人面前直接表达性欲，不能在别人面前放屁，人们不喜欢那样。

”“那我们为什么还要回到现实世界呢，听起来在那里我们什么都不能做。

你是我最好的朋友，而你甚至不能在我面前放屁，这太糟糕了。

”你可能胆小猥琐愚蠢肤浅丑陋无能一无是处，但那也是你啊。

你总能创造些微美好的，哪怕是只有自己认可的美好也行。

不接受真正的自己，活着的这个就不是“你”了。

有时候我们无力改变，无法让自己变好，无法让世界变好。

躲起来不行吗？

我们真的有资格评判别人的生活状态吗？

有些人只能在虚构臆想中获得快乐，连那快乐你都要剥夺吗？

这问题我每天都在心中重复几十遍。

我希望人和人之间能有沟通和理解，但毕竟理解是件困难的事。

至少保持尊重不可以吗？

如果全世界都讨厌你，也请你不要讨厌自己。

如果世界只让你绝望，那么孤独就孤独吧。

蛋妮在片子里特别美，特别可爱。

然而我无法分辨什么时候是真人什么时候是假人，所以……（笑）原声里有好多是蛋妮自己唱的，非常好听。

男主保罗·达诺是个不太出名的好演员，其实他演的戏我们都看过：《战争与和平》、《年轻气盛》、《囚徒》、《为奴十二载》、《环形使者》、《血色将至》、《阳光小美女》、《黑道家族》。

他的演技真的非常非常赞，只举一个例子：Hank扮成Sarah和Manny坐在一起，牵他的手，明明是凌乱搞笑、东拼西凑的女装，大家却都觉得那一刻他特别美丽温柔。

18年他会导演一部叫《狂野生活》的电影，主演是杰克吉伦哈尔和凯瑞穆里根，可以期待一下。

看完《瑞士军刀男》，我突然想到了鲁迅曾在1923年写过的一篇杂文，叫做《娜拉走后怎样》，这篇文章是针对易卜生的戏剧《玩偶之家》女主角的最终选择而做的进一步阐释，在本文中，鲁迅最终得出了这样的结论：娜拉不是堕落，就是回来。

本片看似是一部屎尿屁类型的美式搞笑片，但是内核的深度却触及到了现代社会中的“存在”意识，这也是当代电影区别古典电影的标志。

不少复古的人都很质疑当代电影的价值，毕竟在好莱坞古典叙事和欧洲艺术电影面前，貌似当下的电影制作变得乏善可陈，除了资本堆积复制了一大批“超漫”大片之外，很少有电影能在技巧和立意上高于那些经典佳作，但是我们却忽略了当代电影对于当下“人”的关注，尤其是存在主义和后现代主义盛行的当下，很多佳作都是“小而美”的突破，并不是“大而全”的妄念。

《瑞士军刀男》的故事可以说是对于近些年来“孤独式”主题电影的再次探讨，而且由于本片的形式新颖，制作优良，将“孤独”这个理念变着法地切入进观影者内心，这才是它的成功之处。

不管是《荒野生存》中对于“物质”的怀疑和精神自由的向往；还是《她》和《机械姬》中对于在智能机械下，传统人的情爱变质；亦或者是《旅行终点》里借用当代作家的内心空虚来延宕作为人的“个体孤独”，都是在大方向里给人“伤怀”般的触感。

而《瑞士军刀男》的独特之处在于，这次它开始从个人自身和心理学层面对“孤独”和“失败”抽丝剥茧，自行治愈。

片中的汉克作为主导者，有着弗洛伊德精神解析中“超我”的身份，而“瑞士军刀男”——曼宁则是“本我”的代名词。

整部电影的发展脉络就是“超我”对“本我”的引导和“本我”对“超我”的启迪。

片中雷德克里夫饰演的曼宁一直表现着原始的欲望，不管是在和汉克谈论手淫的实际情况，还是当看到杂志性感女郎照片时生殖器的勃起，亦或者和汉克假扮的“莎拉”交流时，也直接希望通过性交满足自己的欲望。

而保罗·达诺饰演的汉克则一直充当曼宁的“伦理学老师”，左右着曼宁的行为和言谈，这种主导和被动的行为关系无疑是对弗洛伊德心理学的又一次背书。

我们能够看到的是，在这场心灵救赎之旅中，汉克分别解决了三个问题，一个是对于母亲的愧疚，一个是对于父亲的冷漠，最后一个则是对于女神“莎拉”的释然，而这样的三点都是在曼宁的帮助下完成的。

汉克作为“超我”，也就是现代社会中理性的人类，并不能对自己最在乎的三个人释放自我，由于社会的规则，如同汉克一样，我们每个人都生活在“规矩”枷锁的牢笼里，享受当代安稳的“牢狱之灾”，尽管不愿，但是也能“安分守己”，不愿做“出格”的事情，片中为了表现这个思维陷阱，用“公开放屁”作为整个陷阱的诱饵，曼宁企图冲破这一点，所以在片尾和汉克讨论“公开放屁”时，他已经延伸到“隐藏”和“冲破隐藏”的层面。

我往往将一部电影的评价放置在两个层面加以考虑，一个是内容，一个是形式，内容的深邃需要观影者更多的“心眼”和洞悉，毕竟从这部电影中只看出“和死尸相爱而且还是基佬伴侣也是日常”的人并不在少数，雷德克里夫这位“哈利波特”扮演死尸的水平应该是这部电影作为前期宣传最大的看点。

但是形式上的“美”往往是人们一眼就能看出来的，这点无需争辩，就像你可以说看不懂《长江图》，但是你要是说《长江图》画面丑陋，那只能证明你的审美观比别人差了不只是一截。

《瑞士军刀男》便是如此，画面上的清新亮丽在于电影运用了大量的升格镜头，让电影的某些喜剧场面因为浪漫式的慢动作而增色许多，更是让电影的画面充满了魔幻色彩；而在配乐上，本片邀请了曼彻斯特管弦乐队的两位创作者进行了完全的声乐表演，无伴奏的人声合唱让这部电影通过复调式的配乐契合了片中两位男主——汉克和曼宁的人格合一。

让我们来想想本文开头的那个关于娜拉的结论：“要么堕落，要么回去”，相信很多人这时应该理解我的意思了，当汉克再次回到让他倍感孤单和煎熬的社会中，他面临的是诸多的质疑和嘲讽，不仅有他父亲的，更有女神莎拉的，但是他最终选择了释然，选择了公开放屁，也正是因为汉克的选择，曼宁才再次复活，在世人眼中驾驶者他那“屁力小舟”。

片中解决了汉克的矛盾吗？

也许没有，但是最后的那个场景又或许让众多的现实“孤独症患者”寻觅到一丝福音。

每个人心里都有一个曼尼，丑陋，不堪，邋遢，不容世人所理解，做着本体不敢做的事情的一个家伙！

当他们在完全自闭得情况下，可以肆无忌惮的活下去，但是一旦暴露在公众视角下，曼尼就死了！

电影最后曼尼逃离，我是理解为男主不在惧怕心里那个曼尼会让其他人觉得多么慌诞，所以现实中的这个曼尼就选择了离开！

因为你已经在心里有了我！

【这电影看的似懂非懂，感觉想说的很多，很乱，有一肚子的话，但是却说不出个一二三四五。

通常讲述孤独的电影都是压抑的，因为这两个字听起来很沉重。

而《瑞士军刀男》则是用了一个荒诞的故事展现孤独的状态，用充满了屎尿屁的元素让我们反思人生，情节很好笑，可是它所折射出的现实意义要比表面上的笑话沉重的多。

片名很直白的译为《瑞士军刀男》，片名直接透露了电影内容丢失了一点点的神秘感，不过看到香港译名救你命3000...好吧，《瑞士军刀男》这个翻译特别棒！

（含泪手动比心）电影讲了在荒岛上吊的汉克遇到了一个多功能的尸体曼尼二人一起逃离荒岛的故事。

（电影的镜头特别开放，但是感受不到他们与观众的交流，我们只是作为旁观者在跟随他们的故事寻找共鸣。

）电影对人文关怀的表达从二人找到家开始就已经升华到了另一个层次，电影开始开始在笑，然后，泣不成声。

交代故事背景和前史的基调非常轻松，导演给我们呈现出的是充满了下流笑话还有恶趣味的神经喜剧。

其实这是导演在误导我们进入他设下的陷阱，汉克没有朋友没有家人关心，没有生存意义的他才选择了上吊，这个故事听起来其实很悲伤。

所以到了后半段转变的时候我们才会被这种怪异的苦难打动。

虽然是荒唐的故事，却是用现实主义的叙事来讲述故事情节，在场面调度上，电影有大量的唯美空镜头，可以用来当壁纸的像海与树林这种景色。

不过在现实主义叙事里，外在世界用来衬托故事的事件发展，世界是“透明”的，孤岛是汉克自己内心的映射，他什么都没有，当遇到曼尼时，人在极端情况下看见希望，才有了本能的求生欲望。

两个人的性格是相对的。

曼尼做了所有汉克不敢做的事情，他在求生之时荒岛上的曼尼成了汉克唯一可以倾诉和依赖的人。

曼尼也在寻找回家的旅程中自我怀疑，他觉得自己像一个怪胎。

汉克的鼓励也帮助曼尼完成了自我救赎。

曼尼很直接，他不会像汉克那样隐藏自己的情绪。

这种性格冲突才让电影的乐趣加深。

哈利波特(丹尼尔·雷德克里夫）这次的角色真是太考验演技了，他演了一具多功能死尸。

肯定很多人觉得死尸好演，但是这种人物角色的设定更多的是要靠他的肢体语言来引导观众进入他这个角色。

他要掌握好每个动作所传递出来的情绪，还要知道什么时候发出情绪的信号。

这一点也不简单。

（台词太污了。

满满的黄暴台词。。。

= =）电影中有两个重要道具：杂志，手机。

这两个道具的出现一直改变着故事的发展方向，杂志让曼尼重获新生，这个实在是太污了，划重点：重获新生的证明是曼尼的第三条腿站了起来。

因为曼尼说过：“是爱让他重新活过来。

”杂志的另一层意义就是爱与成长。

汉克的成长和这本杂志也有着密不可分的关系，在于曼尼的相处中，他说了这本杂志与他和父亲之间所产生的联系。

（和曼尼对杂志产生的反应相同）而手机则更为重要，由手机引发出了曼尼对爱情的认知，也牵出了汉克两个人的矛盾爆发点也是因为手机，可以说手机一直在推动着剧情发展。

汉克是一个对感情很胆小的人，曼尼在请教他关于感情的问题时汉克自己也不懂，他们都爱着Sarah，但是表现的方式不同。

爱的形式有很多种，如果曼尼活着，他的爱一定是像海啸般的狂风骤雨。

说到爱情，每个男生都会像汉克那样，看着自己爱的人幸福就好吧，没有勇气再上前一步问候。

孤独的人有他们自己的泥沼，以为爱情可以填满人生的遗憾。

然而，制造更多遗憾的却偏偏是爱情。

故事的结尾给了一个开放式的结局我认为这像是一个轮回，曼尼带着屁在海上漂来，电影结束时又放着屁回到了海里。

屎尿屁的元素贯穿始终又很重要。

曼尼看似是一个荒唐的存在但是他拯救了汉克，电影结尾时所有人都见证了曼尼的存在。

所以我没有觉得曼尼没存在过，汉克不像人格分裂，他只是极端的把自己困在了个人安全区里，就是他自己想象出来的荒岛。

每个人都是特别平凡又孤独的存在。

我们盲目的活着，时常感到不安迷惘，敏感又懦弱。

经常在意他人看我们的目光，活在别人的评价里，有些话明明没有意义，还是会在意，人的心灵都脆弱。

大多数人都认不清一个事实：不管是否有人陪伴，生而为人就是孤独。

有身边父母的关心，伴侣的陪伴还是会感到孤独。

没有一个人能感同身受的体会另一个人的感情，这么看来，没有人不孤独。

我们都是汉克，走着一条不被人看好的路。

在看这部奇葩的电影之前，你需要做好充分的心理准备，因为电影里充斥着大量低俗的桥段和有很大可能引发你身体不适的情节，三思而后看吧。

当你做好准备后，你会发现这是一部另类的童话，大有否极泰来之美。

一开始，你可能会认为这哥们就是个恋尸癖，跟一具尸体搞不清楚，好恶心。

但是越看到后面，特别是他用树枝和垃圾建造了巴士、舞会等各式各样的场景后，我的天，这个屌丝简直温柔得逆天了。

是的，每一部电影都有它打动观众的点，而这部电影在恶心观众的同时，让你认同它的世界观的同时，也打动了各位屌丝的内心。

不要介意我这样说，大家都是屌丝这一点你不要否认，要不你没事逛什么豆瓣呢？

下面说说具体的几个点吧。

画面1，汉克看向手中刚刚捡到的木塞子太邪恶了，我居然第一秒就想到了这是要塞住曼尼的菊花，谁让他老放屁呢，我真是老司机啊。

这个画面导演很聪明地让绝大部分观众一下就找到了猜到了接下来剧情的快感，很好的增加了观众不经意间的认可。

而后来电影通过汉克对屁的觉悟，让我们理解了导演的意图。

曼尼用屁救了困于孤岛的汉克，但是汉克获救后嫌弃曼尼的屁（好一个白眼狼）。

通过汉克对屁的重新感悟和认可，刻画了汉克重新对自己人生的感知，可以说是人生的升华。

画面2，阳光斑斓的“公交车”上，曼尼握着“莎拉”的手莎拉是汉克伪装的，为的是给曼尼感悟什么是爱情，以开启曼尼的各种功能。

一开始，汉克是很不情愿男扮女装的，觉得很别扭。

但是一来二去，他居然发自内心的喜欢上了莎拉这个角色，只要一带上红色的自制假发，就不由自主的变身莎拉，和曼尼爱得不亦乐乎，各种各样童话般的浪漫也就此展开。

好吧，能把和尸体谈恋爱这个污的情节搞得如此感人，导演你赢了。

画面3,曼尼在海浪中，放着屁，绝浪而去本片基本上所有的角色都出现在这个场景中，他们震惊于曼尼的奇特，只有汉克，那眼神中透露出来的欣慰和不舍，这两种截然相反的感情，不得不说这哥们演技真棒。

曼尼的离去，象征着所有不合理和怪诞的离去，而对于汉克来说，所有美好的童话也随之破碎，众人的满意也可能是某个人的失意。

我讲讲我的看法，《瑞士军刀男》这部奇葩电影我是这样分析的，曼尼就只是一具意外死亡的尸体，被汉克在水边捡到。

而汉克一直都只是在离他暗恋的女人不远处的森林里，并没有流落荒岛。

捡到尸体后的汉克由于长时间得不到父亲的理解，也得不到长时间暗恋的女人的爱，发生了癔症，幻想着尸体活了过来，还给尸体取了名字，叫曼尼。

汉克为曼尼做的事情就是他要为自己圆的一个梦——汉克扮演莎拉，曼尼扮演汉克，从他们相遇到相爱，他们度过了短暂却美好的梦幻人生，直到被熊袭击，汉克才不得不找到居民区求救。

看，这样的剧情是多么合理，又多么悲伤，到底是承受了多少悲伤和不解，汉克才会被摧残得做这样的事情来安慰自己，真是鬼知道汉克经历了什么……最后，这部另类的“屌丝的悲哀”踏踏实实在光棍节来临之际，抚慰了广大屌丝的心，不要怕，没人关爱算什么，来来来，咱自己幻想一个。

在幻想的世界里，你就是自己的神。

by Matt Mulcahey 原文：http://filmmakermagazine.com/99076-fart-to-the-heart-larkin-seiple-on-swiss-army-man/#.V_UGi_l96Hs

Larkin SeipleFilmmaker: How did you meet Swiss Army Man co-directors Dan Kwan and Daniel Scheinert (aka “Daniels”)?Seiple: We all studied at Emerson College in Boston but I didn’t really know them until after. I met Dan Scheinert because he was in a comedy troupe with one of my roommates. After college [the Daniels] made their first music video and I saw it at a small festival put on by other music video directors called “Videomacher” in Los Angeles. The majority of the videos screened were these big budget “professional” projects and Daniels had made their video for literally no money with a 7D and it just blew everyone else’s video out of the water. I tracked down Scheinert after the screening and gushed about how their video had blown my mind and it made all of the other work feel stale. I had completely forgotten we were surrounded by other directors and very loudly said something like, “You guys destroyed it. Everything else here is crap.” And he was like, “Shhhh.” (laughs) I told them that I wanted to work with them and then they called me to do [Foster the People’s Grammy-nominated music video] “Houdini.”Filmmaker: At what point did you first hear about Swiss Army Man and how did the idea evolve before you started shooting?Seiple: I got involved about a year before [we shot it]. The Daniels were constantly revising the script. It was a very zany script and some of the ideas [from earlier drafts] were even crazier [than what’s in the final film], things like laser eyes and an endless rope made of hair. They kept trying to find this balance between touching and bizarrely comedic, a story you could laugh at but also have it resonate with you. I think they distilled the idea to “a fart to the heart”.Filmmaker: Did anything get cut because of budget or was everything cut for story?Seiple: It was all for story. They would have a great idea that was really fun, but then they would realize that it completely took away from the story or it killed the rhythm so they would scrap it.Filmmaker: Where did you end up shooting?Seiple: We quickly discovered that southern California does not have beautiful forests and no real underbrush that makes forests lush and majestic. We ended up going to northern California, which has one of the most beautiful forests in the world. There’s a place in Eureka in the Redwoods called The Avenue of the Giants that is just stunning. These trees are so huge that you feel like you’re surrounded by ancient ancestors. It’s very quiet too. It reminded me of how the forests feel in Princess Mononoke. There’s just naturally a sense of magic to it.Filmmaker: How about the beach location for the opening scene?Seiple: That beach was also in Eureka. The project was actually shot in three different cities, which made it very challenging. We shot a lot of the bus sequence and a lot of the technical builds in the woods in a small forest outside of San Francisco that matched the redwoods in Eureka. Then we shot in Los Angeles for two weeks — everything in the water tank was shot there, we shot the opening fart scene of [Manny, played by Radcliffe] shooting across the water, and we shot the bear scene because it’s the only place you can get a bear. We also shot all the cave work [in LA]. The cave is actually the cave they used for the Batman TV show, where the Batmobile drives out. So we started in San Francisco, came back to Los Angeles, and then we ended in Eureka with a small crew going to get all of these wonderful moments in the most beautiful forest we could find.Filmmaker: How long was the shoot?Seiple: I think we had 25 days, but we had travel days on top of that. Then we got an extra day to do pick-ups on the very last day of the shoot. That was just me and the directors. Scheinert is the same exact build as Paul Dano so we just kept [Dano’s] wardrobe and shot a lot of the travelogue shots [with Scheinert doubling him], all these beautiful vistas of Scheinert walking around with the dummy.Filmmaker: Are any of the wide shots of Manny and Hank (Dano) crossing that ravine on the giant pipe actually Scheinert and the dummy or is that a VFX composite?Seiple: No, that shot is fake. We were scouting for hours east of Eureka trying to find a place to shoot that [practically]. We didn’t find one but we found a perfect location for our plates. However it was five hours from any major city and we knew we could never come back. Luckily we brought a Red Epic camera so we were able to capture plates for the ten or so angles we needed for the sequence.That pipe sequence was actually shot with several different pieces put together. There’s the shots of them getting onto the pipe, for which we built a fake pipe into a ditch near the side of a road. For the profile angles we broke down and rebuilt the pipe on a ridge so that our background felt high up and far away. Lastly, when they’re hanging off the pipe and for the falling plates, we had to bring in a crane and suspend them and shoot that [against] greenscreen.Filmmaker: You shot the film in July of last year. How did you get it ready for Sundance the following January? That’s incredibly short turnaround.Seiple: Oh yeah, it was nuts. We had an on-set editor, which helped us just emotionally to be able to come back in every day and have a scene from a week ago to look at and see that it was working or if we needed to do pickups. Once we wrapped, Daniels and their editor didn’t stop [working] until Sundance. It was crazy. I think Dan Scheinert was doing VFX comps on Christmas Day.Filmmaker: Did you have a DIT coloring dailies for the on-set editor?Seiple: We did. I had my DIT Matt Conrad, who has done the last three movies with me and for the most part all my commercials and music videos. He built a LUT that we would tweak per scene. For example in the forest there’s all this green bounce everywhere so you’re constantly trying to neutralize that so people’s [skin tones] don’t look like an alien’s. Or if we were cheating a scene for dawn we would warm the highlights and add a bit of magenta. We were able to apply the LUT to our dailies so as they edited they could discern what images worked.Filmmaker: Did you go back and tweak the color grade any more after Sundance?Seiple: We did, but it’s pretty close [to what screened at Sundance]. We went back and tweaked some of the crazier sequences, like some of the night work was really tricky to keep the continuity with a bear and a fireball and all of these visual effects shots. We also added a level of grain to the final version that wasn’t at Sundance to fight the digital look of it. It came off very sharp at the first screening and we just wanted to find a way to soften it a little bit more.Filmmaker: You used Cooke Anamorphics with the Alexa XT?Seiple: Yeah. The Cookes are a really lovely set of lenses. At a T4 or a 5.6 they’re pristine and very sharp, but if you shoot them around a T2.8 they start to have all these little inconsistencies that look really lovely on camera. The 75mm goes really soft on the top and bottom when you shoot wide open, which helped enhance some of the more subjective close ups.

Filmmaker: I read an interview where Daniels talked about the very different processes of Radcliffe and Dano. How do you take into account actors with different working methods when you’re planning the order of your coverage?Seiple: If it was a different movie I’d have a great answer for you, but for this movie we were hustling and moving very fast so those choices came down to “this is the shot that makes the most sense to do next and we’ve only got three takes to do it.” It was very easy to shoot Daniel as he’s always static, but Paul really likes to be in the moment and just let it happen. That’s challenging, because he jumps and moves and darts around a lot and as a camera operator you’re just like, “Alright, he’s still. Nope! He’s over here now.” In one of the opening shots of the film when Paul first hears the fart and he snaps up, you can see in the movie that the camera was not ready for him to pop up and so the camera does a slow drift up to catch up to him. I begged Daniels, “Just give me one more,” but they loved it.Filmmaker: Walk me through the fake Mannys. Did each have a specific function?Seiple: We had a small brigade of Mannys. One was stunt Manny, where the face work wasn’t as precise but he was about the weight of a human being so we could throw him around realistically. One was a much lighter Manny that I think had the best face work and we would use that for things like the scene where the raccoon [chews on Manny’s face]. There’s one take that they took out that I wish they would’ve kept where the raccoon goes right for Manny’s eyelid and pulls it open and it was terrifying. (laughs) That Manny was also super lightweight so Paul wouldn’t mess his back up by carrying around 150 pounds of weight every day. And then there was the floating Manny that we built a small air tube into so that it could consistently fart and float in the water. The floating dummy was a little tricky because we had to have multiple people on strings pulling him at the same time you had a guy running with an air tank so the dummy could emit farts.But ultimately we used Daniel Radcliffe more than anything else. Paul does carry Daniel quite a bit. When a scene wasn’t working with the dummy, we’d say, “Alright, let’s just do it with Daniel.” Daniel was also really insistent on trying to be in every shot he could to support Paul. We ultimately only used the dummy for things that a human shouldn’t do.Filmmaker: Did the AD supply your on-set fart noises?Seiple: Actually either Kwan or Scheinert would do it when we were shooting because the farts had to be very specific. They all have a different emotion to them. I don’t know if the video made it [online], but when Manny first starts farting on the beach Scheinert was conducting him off camera, literally like a symphony of farts. Scheinert would raise his arms and bring them down and raise them again and then simmer it down. It was a pretty interesting sight to behold.Filmmaker: Tell me about the set-up for the opening title card shot – which is a super wide shot of Hank riding Manny like a fart-propelled jet ski. Both the actors and the camera are moving at a pretty good clip.Seiple: That whole sequence, like everything else, was pieced together. All of the shots of Paul and Radcliffe were done with them on a giant boogie board dragging them through the Pacific Ocean with some gnarly waves. They could at any moment get tossed off, which is a little intimidating if you don’t like swimming in the middle of the ocean. So we shot all of their close-up work like that and then we had a stuntman dressed in Paul’s gear and we put the dummy on a very small knee board and the stuntman would climb on and we would get like 10 seconds of footage before he got knocked off by a wave.Filmmaker: So the stuntman was being pulled by some type of boat?Seiple: Yeah, I think it was a motorboat pulling them and then in post we removed the wake and the foam caused by it. The camera was on a zoom lens tracking with them at high speed on a flat-bottom boat. That scene was bananas to shoot and shooting in the ocean is very frustrating. Everything is always drifting or changing with the current so we figured the best solution was to shoot on a zoom, on a crane, with a remote head so we could literally swing the camera anywhere we had to. We barely got all the shots. We grabbed the last one at dusk and there was a very beautiful sunset but it lit the water with oranges and pinks so in post we had to color grade the crap out of it and force blue back into the water. That was a very challenging scene to shoot/grade because it goes from hard sunlight to soft sunlight to sunset and we had to make that all feel like it takes place at the same time. Luckily we had Sofie Borup color grade the film and she did a wonderful job.Filmmaker: Do you have any horror stories about the bear or the raccoons?Seiple: The raccoons were good. I believe their names were Boris and Natasha. Raccoons can really only either grab something or run away and each of the raccoons had a specific move that it could do. So they weren’t too bad, we just had to do a lot of takes and they were constantly trying to escape, which made the owners nervous because we were in a giant forest.The bear was challenging to shoot in that we didn’t have a lot of time with it. We had to set up an electric fence around the bear wherever we were shooting just in case something went wrong, which is nerve-wracking to shoot any sequence where you’re surrounded by an electric fence for your protection. The owners also seemed a little intimidated by the bear. (laughs) They looked very nervous when he wasn’t in the cage. Its main lure was ice cream sandwiches. They would throw five or ten of them back into his cage whenever they finished a take. He loved them. The bear’s name was Tag and he was very sweet but you could hear him rolling around in the cage and you thought, “My god, how much does he weigh?” The suspension on the truck was just shaking.One tricky part was that he photographed much darker than we expected so we had to redo all of our lighting once we actually framed up on the bear. Our gaffer, Matt Ardine, had designed a wonderful lighting setup of moving lights on Condors and thank god they were all remote controlled. We were able to pan and tilt them remotely and increase the intensity, so once the bear came out we quickly re-lit the scene and over-lit the hell out of it just so we could see the bear. So when we shot the bear it looked like a high key comedy with super bright moonlight and a vibrant background and it was supposed to be a moody scene at night. In post we had to go in and basically bring down [the levels on] everything but the bear.Filmmaker: In addition to the Alexa you used the Phantom Flex 4K for a few sequences, including the shots where Manny and Hank burst out from underneath the water in slow motion.Seiple: That was a big moment in the movie for Daniels and they wanted it to be otherworldly so we decided to shoot it at a high frame rate to enhance that state of awe. That was half stuntmen and half real actors. The shot of them initially bursting out of the water is just Paul and Daniel (Radcliffe) in the shallow end of a pool jumping out of the water from underneath, which looked great. Then for the wide shot we built a system of trusses over the pool and had high-speed cable rigged to two stuntmen underwater. On action the motor would go and it would rip these guys upwards out of the water. We shot that against greenscreen and combined it with the plates we shot four months earlier on that scout.Filmmaker: What frame rate did you end up shooting at?Seiple: I think it was 1,000 [frames per second]. At that speed you get a 4K image. If you shoot 2,000 frames per second you get a 2K image. We went for the higher resolution because we knew that we had to cut it out of the greenscreen and we needed all the resolution we could get.Filmmaker: Did you have to pump a lot of light onto the actors to expose for a frame rate that high?Seiple: We had plenty of light. The tricky part was matching it to those plates we’d already shot. When we shot the plates it was sunny but partly cloudy so it’s direct light but soft. To match that light we shaded the pool in a 20’x20’ of Full Grid rigged off a Condor to soften the sunlight. Then to give them a subtle edge we spotted in two M90s just off camera.

Filmmaker: There’s some behind the scenes footage out there that shows how you shot the sequence in which Radcliffe – propelled skyward by an ignited fart – falls back down to earth through a series of tree branches. In the footage you see a Red Epic rigged to a Doggy Cam and crew members whacking Radcliffe with branches.Seiple: The choice that we made to make it a body mount POV shot of Manny falling through the trees was really done because we didn’t know how to shoot it any other way. We created a moving light rig around Radcliffe using LED tubes to make it as though the moonlight is circling him as he falls. It wasn’t actually a Doggy Cam mount. It was some funky mount rig my key grip Nick Kirsten had found. We couldn’t afford Doggy Cam.Filmmaker: Did you use the Epic for that just because it’s smaller and lighter?Seiple: Yeah, we did it for the weight. The Alexa Mini either wasn’t out yet or we couldn’t get our hands on it, I don’t remember which. And the (higher) resolution (of the Epic compared to the Alexa) helped a little bit too so that in post they could zoom in or reframe a little bit. But mainly it was because we didn’t want to put all this weight on Daniel Radcliffe while he was also being hit by branches.

BGM太棒了。

后来听说是先有的BGM再有的电影，觉得挺合理的。

看完之后感觉脑袋里被塞了好多东西，可是又无从说起，大概只能记下碎片式的感触，有条有理的行文就无理了。

很奇怪，电影结束之后，我对丹尼尔演的曼尼到底是真的有特殊功能的尸体还是汉克脑海里的另一个自己并不是太计较，更让我念念不忘的是电影里片段式的对白和场景。

曼尼是一个一无所知的尸体，不知道爱，不知道性，不知道公交，无知也无惧。

而汉克和我们一样，至少和我一样，熟知一切规则和约束，也小心翼翼地遵守着，他害怕人们的目光，害怕出格，害怕丢脸。

当曼尼作为一个一无所知的尸体闯入汉克的世界，对汉克习以为常的东西表示疑问和质疑时，他也闯入了我的世界，让我动摇。

这个一无所知的尸体，让我发现原来公交车那么美，坐在座位上听着歌，摇摇摆摆地路过世界原来是那么有趣的一件事情。

可是这个尸体也让我看见，我的生活里有那么多早已习惯的约束，小到屎尿屁大到情爱生死，为了不被人们用奇怪的目光注视着，我们给自己加了大大小小的规则，却习惯到根本想不到去质疑。

可能因为自己已经不可能不去遵守这些规则了，所以当可以不遵守一切规则的曼尼伤心地说着“你看到他们的眼神了吗？

”，当他上一秒还欢欣雀跃，下一秒却因为别人的目光死去，变成了一具普通的尸体时，我才会那么悲伤和无力。

也许因为我本人性格就很收敛，刻意的不会太喜欢人也不会太讨厌人，小心的不得罪人也给自己留有余地，虽然成天乐呵呵的，不像汉克这么敏感和柔软，可还是从汉克的身上看到了一些自己的影子，也跟着汉克一起被曼尼动摇了，所以才会感觉沉重，也被很深地触动到了吧。

虽然也许规则还是要遵守，也许也会陷入大大小小的困境，但也许，只是也许，我能独自挺过去。